Paper · 2012 · Field Crops Research

Drought stress characterization of post-rainy season (rabi) sorghum in India

Jana Kholová; Greg McLean; Vincent Vadez; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
89
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

During the post-rainy (rabi) season in India around 3 million tonnes of sorghum grain is produced from 5.7 million ha of cropping. This underpins the livelihood of about 5 million households. Severe drought is common as the crop grown in these areas relies largely on soil moisture stored during the preceding rainy season. Improvement of rabi sorghum cultivars through breeding has been slow but could be accelerated if drought scenarios in the production regions were better understood. The sorghum crop model within the APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator) platform was used to simulate crop growth and yield and the pattern of crop water status through each season using available historical weather data. The current model reproduced credibly the observed yield variation across the production region (R2 = 0.73). The simulated trajectories of drought stress through each crop season were clustered into five different drought stress patterns. A majority of trajectories indicated terminal drought (43%) with various timings of onset during the crop cycle. The most severe droughts (25% of seasons) were when stress began before flowering and resulted in failure of grain production in most cases, although biomass production was not affected so severely. The frequencies of drought stress types were analyzed for selected locations throughout the rabi tract and showed different zones had different predominating stress patterns. This knowledge can help better focus the search for adaptive traits and management practices to specific stress situations and thus accelerate improvement of rabi sorghum via targeted specific adaptation. The case study presented here is applicable to other sorghum growing environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The APSIM sorghum model reproduced observed yield variation across the production region with R2 = 0.73.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Outcome
observed yield variatione0
Value
R2 = 0.73e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The current model reproduced credibly the observed yield variation across the production region (R2 = 0.73).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sorghum crop model within the APSIM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated seasonal drought trajectories clustered into five patterns.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
drought stress patternse0
Value
fivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The simulated trajectories of drought stress through each crop season were clustered into five different drought stress patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Terminal drought occurred in 43% of simulated trajectories.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
terminal droughte0
Value
43%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A majority of trajectories indicated terminal drought (43%) with various timings of onset during the crop cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The most severe droughts began before flowering in 25% of seasons.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Organ / stage
before floweringe0
Outcome
most severe droughtse0
Value
25% of seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most severe droughts (25% of seasons) were when stress began before flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Early severe drought caused grain production failure in most cases.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
stress began before floweringe0
Outcome
grain productione0
Direction
failuree0
Qualifier
in most casese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stress began before flowering and resulted in failure of grain production in most cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Early severe drought affected biomass production less severely than grain production.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
stress began before floweringe1
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
not affected so severelye0
Comparator
grain productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“failure of grain production in most cases, although biomass production was not affected so severely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“stress began before flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Different rabi zones had different predominant drought-stress patterns.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
predominating stress patternse0
Setting
different zonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different zones had different predominating stress patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.