Paper · 2011 · American Journal of Botany

Wood properties and trunk allometry of co‐occurring rainforest canopy trees in a cyclone‐prone environment

Jennifer Read; Robert Evans; Gordon D. Sanson; et al.

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

PREMISE OF STUDY: New Caledonia commonly experiences cyclones, so trees there are expected to have enhanced wood traits and trunk allometry that confer resistance to wind damage. We ask whether there is evidence of a trade-off between these traits and growth rate among species. METHODS: Wood traits, including density, microfibril angle (MFA), and modulus of elasticity (MOE), ratio of tree height to stem diameter, and growth rate were investigated in mature trees of 15 co-occurring canopy species in a New Caledonian rainforest. KEY RESULTS: In contrast to some studies, wood density did not correlate negatively with growth increment. Among angiosperms, wood density and MOE correlated positively with diameter-adjusted tree height, and MOE correlated positively with stem-diameter growth increment. Tall slender trees achieved high stiffness with high efficiency with respect to wood density, in part by low MFA, and with a higher diameter growth increment but a lower buckling safety factor. However, some tree species of a similar niche differed in whole-tree resistance to wind damage and achieved wood stiffness in different ways. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a growth-safety trade-off in these trees. In forests that regularly experience cyclones, there may be stronger selection for high wood density and/or stiffness in fast-growing trees of the upper canopy, with the potential growth trade-off amortized by access to the upper canopy and by other plant traits. Furthermore, decreasing wood density does not necessarily decrease resistance to wind damage, resistance being influenced by other characteristics including cell-level traits (e.g., MFA) and whole-plant architecture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wood density did not correlate negatively with growth increment in canopy trees.

Taxon
treest0
Organ / stage
woode0
Outcome
growth incremente0
Direction
did not correlate negativelye0

Verbatim

e0

“wood density did not correlate negatively with growth increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among angiosperm canopy trees, greater wood density correlated with greater diameter-adjusted tree height.

Taxon
angiospermsMagnoliopsidae0
Organ / stage
woode0
Outcome
diameter-adjusted tree heighte0
Direction
correlated positivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“Among angiosperms, wood density and MOE correlated positively with diameter-adjusted tree height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among angiosperm canopy trees, greater MOE correlated with greater diameter-adjusted tree height.

Taxon
angiospermsMagnoliopsidae0
Organ / stage
woode0
Outcome
diameter-adjusted tree heighte0
Direction
correlated positivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“Among angiosperms, wood density and MOE correlated positively with diameter-adjusted tree height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among angiosperm canopy trees, MOE correlated positively with stem-diameter growth increment.

Taxon
treest0
Organ / stage
trunkt0
Outcome
stem-diameter growth incremente0
Direction
correlated positivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“MOE correlated positively with stem-diameter growth increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“trunk allometry of co‐occurring rainforest canopy trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–75 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall slender trees achieved high stiffness efficiently relative to wood density, partly through low MFA.

Taxon
treese0
Outcome
high stiffnesse0
Qualifier
low MFAe0

Verbatim

e0

“Tall slender trees achieved high stiffness with high efficiency with respect to wood density, in part by low MFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–917 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall slender trees had higher diameter growth increment.

Taxon
treese0
Outcome
diameter growth incremente0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Tall slender trees achieved high stiffness with high efficiency with respect to wood density, in part by low MFA, and with a higher diameter growth increment but a lower buckling safety factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–997 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall slender trees had a lower buckling safety factor.

Taxon
treese0
Outcome
buckling safety factore0
Direction
lowere0

Verbatim

e0

“Tall slender trees achieved high stiffness with high efficiency with respect to wood density, in part by low MFA, and with a higher diameter growth increment but a lower buckling safety factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–997 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some tree species occupying similar niches differed in whole-tree wind-damage resistance.

Taxon
tree speciese0
Outcome
whole-tree resistance to wind damagee0
Direction
differede0

Verbatim

e0

“some tree species of a similar niche differed in whole-tree resistance to wind damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1093 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some tree species occupying similar niches achieved wood stiffness in different ways.

Taxon
tree speciese0
Outcome
wood stiffnesse0
Direction
different wayse0

Verbatim

e0

“some tree species of a similar niche differed in whole-tree resistance to wind damage and achieved wood stiffness in different ways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trees showed no evidence of a growth-safety trade-off.

Taxon
treese0
Outcome
growth-safety trade-offe0
Direction
no evidencee0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence of a growth-safety trade-off in these trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1219 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing wood density does not necessarily reduce wind-damage resistance because other cell and architecture traits contribute.

Taxon
treest0
Outcome
resistance to wind damagee0
Qualifier
cell-level traits (e.g., MFA) and whole-plant architecturee0

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing wood density does not necessarily decrease resistance to wind damage, resistance being influenced by other characteristics including cell-level traits (e.g., MFA) and whole-plant architecture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1700 · show in text ↑
t0

“trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑