Paper · 2014 · Functional Plant Biology

How different pruning severities alter shoot structure: a modelling approach in young ‘Nonpareil’ almond trees

Claudia Negrón; Loreto Contador; Bruce D. Lampinen; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Axillary meristem fate patterns along shoots, also referred to as shoot structure, appear to be fairly consistent among trees within a genotype growing under similar conditions. Less is known about shoot structural plasticity following external manipulations, such as pruning. The aim of this study on almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.)) shoots was to investigate how pruning severity affects the structure of 1-year-old shoots that grew after pruning (regrowth shoots), the 2-year-old portion of shoots that remained from the previous year's growth after pruning (pruned shoots), and whether regrowth shoots reiterate the structure of the original 1-year-old shoots before pruning. Three pruning severities were imposed and the structures along the different shoots were assessed by building hidden semi-Markov models of axillary meristem fates. The structures of regrowth and pruned shoots depended on pruning severity, but maintained some of the original shoot characteristics. Regrowth shoots developed more complex structures with severe pruning, but had simpler structures than original shoots indicating progressive simplification with tree age. Pruned shoot structures were affected by the severity of pruning, by the structure when the shoots were 1 year old, and probably by local competition among buds. Changes in structure due to pruning can be modelled and be predictable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regrowth and pruned shoot structure depended on pruning severity yet retained original traits.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
pruning severitye0
Outcome
structures of regrowth and pruned shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The structures of regrowth and pruned shoots depended on pruning severity, but maintained some of the original shoot characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe pruning produced more complex regrowth shoot structures.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
severe pruninge0
Outcome
Regrowth shootse0
Direction
more complexe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regrowth shoots developed more complex structures with severe pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regrowth shoot structures were simpler than original shoots.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Outcome
simpler structurese0
Direction
simplere0
Comparator
original shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had simpler structures than original shoots indicating progressive simplification with tree age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruned shoot structures were associated with pruning severity, prior structure and probably local bud competition.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Outcome
Pruned shoot structurese0
Qualifier
probably by local competition among budse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruned shoot structures were affected by the severity of pruning, by the structure when the shoots were 1 year old, and probably by local competition among buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning related shoot structure changes can be modeled and predicted.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Outcome
Changes in structure due to pruninge0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in structure due to pruning can be modelled and be predictable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.