Paper · 2009 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Post-veraison sunlight exposure induces MYB-mediated transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin and flavonol synthesis in berry skins of Vitis vinifera

José Tomás Matus; Rodrigo Loyola; Andrea Vega; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
315
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Anthocyanins, flavan-3-ols, and flavonols are the three major classes of flavonoid compounds found in grape berry tissues. Several viticultural practices increase flavonoid content in the fruit, but the underlying genetic mechanisms responsible for these changes have not been completely deciphered. The impact of post-veraison sunlight exposure on anthocyanin and flavonol accumulation in grape berry skin and its relation to the expression of different transcriptional regulators known to be involved in flavonoid synthesis was studied. Treatments consisting of removing or moving aside the basal leaves which shade berry clusters were applied. Shading did not affect sugar accumulation or gene expression of HEXOSE TRANSPORTER 1, although in the leaf removal treatment, these events were retarded during the first weeks of ripening. Flavonols were the most drastically reduced flavonoids following shading and leaf removal treatments, related to the reduced expression of FLAVONOL SYNTHASE 4 and its putative transcriptional regulator MYB12. Anthocyanin accumulation and the expression of CHS2, LDOX, OMT, UFGT, MYBA1, and MYB5a genes were also affected. Other regulatory genes were less affected or not affected at all by these treatments. Non-transcriptional control mechanisms for flavonoid synthesis are also suggested, especially during the initial stages of ripening. Although berries from the leaf removal treatment received more light than shaded fruits, malvidin-3-glucoside and total flavonol content was reduced compared with the treatment without leaf removal. This work reveals that flavonol-related gene expression responds rapidly to field changes in light levels, as shown by the treatment in which shaded fruits were exposed to light in the late stages of ripening. Taken together, this study establishes MYB-specific responsiveness for the effect of sun exposure and sugar transport on flavonoid synthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not affect berry sugar accumulation or HEXOSE TRANSPORTER 1 expression.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Shadinge0
Gene
HEXOSE TRANSPORTER 1e0
Outcome
sugar accumulation or gene expression of HEXOSE TRANSPORTER 1e0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading did not affect sugar accumulation or gene expression of HEXOSE TRANSPORTER 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal delayed sugar accumulation and HEXOSE TRANSPORTER 1 expression in early ripening.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
leaf removal treatmente0
Outcome
sugar accumulation or gene expression of HEXOSE TRANSPORTER 1e1
Direction
retardede0
Qualifier
first weeks of ripeninge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although in the leaf removal treatment, these events were retarded during the first weeks of ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–835 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shading did not affect sugar accumulation or gene expression of HEXOSE TRANSPORTER 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading and leaf removal reduced flavonols most drastically.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
shading and leaf removal treatmentse0
Outcome
Flavonolse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavonols were the most drastically reduced flavonoids following shading and leaf removal treatments, related to the reduced expression of FLAVONOL SYNTHASE 4 and its putative transcriptional regulator MYB12.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading and leaf removal reduced expression of FLAVONOL SYNTHASE 4 and MYB12.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
shading and leaf removal treatmentse0
Gene
FLAVONOL SYNTHASE 4e0
Outcome
expression of FLAVONOL SYNTHASE 4 and its putative transcriptional regulator MYB12e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavonols were the most drastically reduced flavonoids following shading and leaf removal treatments, related to the reduced expression of FLAVONOL SYNTHASE 4 and its putative transcriptional regulator MYB12.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments affected anthocyanin accumulation and expression of six named genes.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
shading and leaf removal treatmentse1
Outcome
Anthocyanin accumulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin accumulation and the expression of CHS2, LDOX, OMT, UFGT, MYBA1, and MYB5a genes were also affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“shading and leaf removal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal reduced malvidin-3-glucoside and total flavonols despite greater berry light exposure.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
leaf removal treatmente0
Outcome
malvidin-3-glucoside and total flavonol contente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
treatment without leaf removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although berries from the leaf removal treatment received more light than shaded fruits, malvidin-3-glucoside and total flavonol content was reduced compared with the treatment without leaf removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavonol-related gene expression responded rapidly when late-ripening shaded fruit was exposed to light.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
shaded fruits were exposed to lighte0
Outcome
flavonol-related gene expressione0
Direction
responds rapidlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flavonol-related gene expression responds rapidly to field changes in light levels, as shown by the treatment in which shaded fruits were exposed to light in the late stages of ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–150 · show in text ↑

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

52 papers: 37 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

shade · molecular: expression · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.