Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Influence of Boron Nutrition on Membrane Leakage, Chlorophyll Content and Gas Exchange Characteristics in Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)

N. Ahmed; M. Abid; A. Rashid; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Understanding the effect of boron (B) on plant physiology will help to refine the diagnosis of B deficiency and improvement in B fertilizer recommendations for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growing areas. This study shows the testing of hypotheses “that application of B-fertilizer improves net photosynthetic rate (PN) and water use efficiency (WUE) for cotton plant on a B-deficient soil [< 0.50 mg B kg−1 hydrochloric acid (HCl)-extractable] in an arid environment”. Thus, a permanent layout [two-year field experiment (2004 and 2005)] was conducted to study the impact of B fertilizer at 0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 kg ha−1 on gas exchange and electrolyte leakage (EL) characteristics of cotton crop (cv. ‘CIM-473’). The soil at experimental site was alkaline (pH 8.1), calcareous [calcium carbonate (CaCO3 5.6%)], and silt loam (Typic Haplocambid). Boron use decreased EL of plant membrane (P ≤ 0.05), and increased PN, transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs), while intercellular concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2; Ci) significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) during both experimental years. There was a positive, but non-significant effect of B concentration on chlorophyll content in plant leaves. Application of 3.0 kg B ha−1 improved WUE up to 9.7% [4.62 μmol (CO2) mmol−1 water (H2O)] compared to control plants (4.21 [μmol (CO2) mmol−1 (H2O)]. Principal component analysis (PCA) of data indicates positive correlations between leaf B concentration and PN, E, gs, and WUE, while a negative relationship existed between leaf B concentration and intercellular CO2 (Ci). This study showed that addition of B fertilizer in the B-deficient calcareous soil proved beneficial for growth and development for cotton crop by enhancing its WUE and gas exchange characteristics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron use decreased electrolyte leakage of cotton leaf membranes.

Treatment
Boron usee0
Outcome
EL of plant membranee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Boron use decreased EL of plant membrane (P ≤ 0.05), and increased PN, transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs), while intercellular concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2; Ci) significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) during both experimental years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron use increased net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance of cotton.

Treatment
Boron usee0
Outcome
PN, transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Boron use decreased EL of plant membrane (P ≤ 0.05), and increased PN, transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs), while intercellular concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2; Ci) significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) during both experimental years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron use decreased intercellular CO2 concentration in cotton in both experimental years.

Treatment
Boron usee0
Outcome
intercellular concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2; Ci)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Boron use decreased EL of plant membrane (P ≤ 0.05), and increased PN, transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs), while intercellular concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2; Ci) significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) during both experimental years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B concentration had a positive but non-significant effect on chlorophyll content in cotton leaves.

Organ / stage
plant leavese2
Treatment
B concentratione2
Outcome
chlorophyll content in plant leavese2
Direction
positivee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was a positive, but non-significant effect of B concentration on chlorophyll content in plant leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 3.0 kg B ha−1 improved water use efficiency of cotton by up to 9.7% compared with control plants.

Treatment
Application of 3.0 kg B ha−1e1
Outcome
WUEe1
Direction
improvede1
Value
9.7%e1
Qualifier
4.21 [μmol (CO2) mmol−1 (H2O)]e1
Comparator
control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 3.0 kg B ha−1 improved WUE up to 9.7% [4.62 μmol (CO2) mmol−1 water (H2O)] compared to control plants (4.21 [μmol (CO2) mmol−1 (H2O)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1368 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf B concentration correlated positively with net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance in cotton.

Organ / stage
leafe3
Treatment
leaf B concentratione3
Outcome
PN, E, gse3
Direction
positivee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“Principal component analysis (PCA) of data indicates positive correlations between leaf B concentration and PN, E, gs, and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1496 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf B concentration correlated positively with water use efficiency in cotton.

Organ / stage
leafe3
Treatment
leaf B concentratione3
Outcome
WUEe3
Direction
positivee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“Principal component analysis (PCA) of data indicates positive correlations between leaf B concentration and PN, E, gs, and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1496 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf B concentration correlated negatively with intercellular CO2 in cotton.

Organ / stage
leafe4
Treatment
leaf B concentratione4
Outcome
intercellular CO2 (Ci)e4
Direction
negativee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium HirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“while a negative relationship existed between leaf B concentration and intercellular CO2 (Ci)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1591 · show in text ↑

boron atom · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

boron atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Boron deficiency decreased cotton leaf net photosynthetic rate.

    Cotton Growth and Physiological Responses to Boron Deficiency · 2003

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.