Paper · 1984 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Grain sorghum response to plant residue‐recycled iron and other iron sources

J. E. Matocha

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Inorganic Fe sources applied to the soil are usually not effective for correcting iron chlorosis unless extremely high rates are used. Certain synthetic chelates and some organically complexed Fe compounds are somewhat effective in soil applications but their use is not economically feasible except on high cash value crops, gardens and ornamentals. The most effective correction of Fe chlorosis on field crops is foliar spray applications with Fe compounds. However, in severe chlorosis, several separate spray applications may be needed. Field experiments were conducted on two soils supporting severely and slightly Fe chlorotic grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to determine the agronomic effectiveness of various Fe sources. Plant complexed Fe sources using post‐harvest grain sorghum stubble and iron‐efficient Amaranthus spp plants were compared with a synthetic chelate for efficacy in correcting Fe chlorosis on grain sorghum. Industrial byproducts containing acid and Fe were also compared. Sorghum growing on mildly Fe deficient soil produced highest grain yields when supplied with Fe‐enriched sorghum residue (Fe‐SR). Seedband placement of acidified mining residue (AMR) resulted in vegetative response but had no effect on grain yields. On severely Fe deficient soil, Fe‐enriched Amaranthus (Fe‐AR) was evaluated as a plant‐complexed Fe source. Highest dry matter and grain yields were associated with multiple foliar sprays, Fe‐AR and high rates of AMR. Data indicated that Fe‐AR was more effective than Fe‐SR while both sources induced a better plant response than Fe‐EDDHA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-enriched sorghum residue gave the highest grain yield on mildly iron deficient soil.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Fe‐enriched sorghum residue (Fe‐SR)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
mildly Fe deficient soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum growing on mildly Fe deficient soil produced highest grain yields when supplied with Fe‐enriched sorghum residue (Fe‐SR).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedband AMR produced a vegetative response.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Seedband placement of acidified mining residue (AMR)e0
Outcome
vegetative responsee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedband placement of acidified mining residue (AMR) resulted in vegetative response but had no effect on grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedband AMR had no effect on grain yield.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Seedband placement of acidified mining residue (AMR)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedband placement of acidified mining residue (AMR) resulted in vegetative response but had no effect on grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple foliar sprays were associated with the highest dry matter yield on severely iron deficient soil.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
multiple foliar sprayse0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest dry matter and grain yields were associated with multiple foliar sprays, Fe‐AR and high rates of AMR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-enriched Amaranthus was associated with the highest dry matter and grain yields on severely iron deficient soil.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Fe‐ARe0
Outcome
dry matter and grain yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest dry matter and grain yields were associated with multiple foliar sprays, Fe‐AR and high rates of AMR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High AMR rates were associated with the highest dry matter and grain yields on severely iron deficient soil.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
high rates of AMRe0
Outcome
dry matter and grain yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest dry matter and grain yields were associated with multiple foliar sprays, Fe‐AR and high rates of AMR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-AR was more effective than Fe-SR for sorghum response.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Fe‐ARe0
Outcome
plant responsee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
Fe‐SRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data indicated that Fe‐AR was more effective than Fe‐SR while both sources induced a better plant response than Fe‐EDDHA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-AR produced a better plant response than Fe-EDDHA.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Fe‐ARe0
Outcome
plant responsee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Fe‐EDDHAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data indicated that Fe‐AR was more effective than Fe‐SR while both sources induced a better plant response than Fe‐EDDHA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-SR produced a better plant response than Fe-EDDHA.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Fe‐SRe0
Outcome
plant responsee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Fe‐EDDHAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data indicated that Fe‐AR was more effective than Fe‐SR while both sources induced a better plant response than Fe‐EDDHA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.