Paper · 1996 · Plant Pathology

The effect of phenylamide fungicides on the control of potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans ) in England and Wales from 1978 to 1992

N. J. BRADSHAW; T. B. VAUGHAN

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During the period 1978–1992, phenylamide fungicides in co‐formulation with the dithiocarbamate fungicide mancozeb were tested for the control of potato late‐blight in 51 separate field experiments in England and Wales. Whilst there was a general trend over all the experiments which indicated that foliage blight was less severe where the phenylamide + dithiocarbamate mixture had been used, the benefit was more marked in some than in others. Despite the detection of phenylamide resistance, at some sites the mixture gave better control of foliage blight than the dithiocarbamate alone. At one site where continuous data were available, the additional benefit of the phenylamide compound for control of foliage infection was lost after 1986 coinciding with a rise in phenylamide resistance from 31.7% in 1986 to 81% in 1987. Where foliar blight epidemics occurred, yield responses to fungicide programmes compared with unsprayed controls ranged from 0 to +118.5% with a mean response of +30.2%. This is equivalent to 30.8 and 12.92 t/ha respectively. Standardized yield differences were calculated to allow inter‐trial and inter‐year comparisons and showed no benefit from the phenylamide fungicide applied at 14‐day intervals in 33 out of 38 experiments where foliar blight epidemics occurred. At one site, Cusum analysis of standardized yield differences following treatment with the phenylamide + dithiocarbamate mixture and the dithiocarbamate alone showed a mean benefit from the phenylamide mixture of 2.23 t/ha during the period 1978 to 1986. From 1987 to 1992, the yield benefit dropped to a mean level of 0.68 t/ha a decrease of 69.5%. In experiments where blight was not recorded, fungicide treatments had no deleterious effect on yields. Over all the trials, there was no effect of fungicide treatment on the incidence of tuber blight at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenylamide mixture generally reduced foliage blight severity.

Treatment
phenylamide + dithiocarbamate mixturee0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanst0pathogen
Outcome
foliage blighte0
Direction
less severee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliage blight was less severe where the phenylamide + dithiocarbamate mixture had been used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixture controlled foliage blight better than dithiocarbamate alone at some sites.

Treatment
mixturee0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanst0pathogen
Outcome
control of foliage blighte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
dithiocarbamate alonee0
Setting
some sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at some sites the mixture gave better control of foliage blight than the dithiocarbamate alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional control benefit was lost after 1986 at one site.

Outcome
additional benefit of the phenylamide compound for control of foliage infectione0
Direction
loste0
Qualifier
after 1986e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the additional benefit of the phenylamide compound for control of foliage infection was lost after 1986”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenylamide resistance rose from 31.7% in 1986 to 81% in 1987.

Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanst0pathogen
Outcome
phenylamide resistancee0
Value
31.7% in 1986 to 81% in 1987e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phenylamide resistance from 31.7% in 1986 to 81% in 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide programs yielded 0 to +118.5% more than unsprayed controls, mean +30.2%.

Treatment
fungicide programmese0
Outcome
yield responsese0
Value
0 to +118.5%e0
Qualifier
mean response of +30.2%e0
Comparator
unsprayed controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield responses to fungicide programmes compared with unsprayed controls ranged from 0 to +118.5% with a mean response of +30.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenylamide at 14-day intervals gave no yield benefit in 33 of 38 epidemics.

Treatment
phenylamide fungicide applied at 14‐day intervalse0
Outcome
benefite0
Direction
no benefite0
Value
33 out of 38 experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no benefit from the phenylamide fungicide applied at 14‐day intervals in 33 out of 38 experiments where foliar blight epidemics occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenylamide mixture yield benefit averaged 2.23 t/ha in 1978–1986.

Treatment
phenylamide mixturee0
Outcome
mean benefite0
Direction
benefite0
Value
2.23 t/hae0
Qualifier
during the period 1978 to 1986e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a mean benefit from the phenylamide mixture of 2.23 t/ha during the period 1978 to 1986”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield benefit dropped to 0.68 t/ha in 1987–1992, a 69.5% decrease.

Outcome
yield benefite0
Direction
droppede0
Value
0.68 t/hae0
Qualifier
a decrease of 69.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From 1987 to 1992, the yield benefit dropped to a mean level of 0.68 t/ha a decrease of 69.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide did not reduce yields when blight was absent.

Treatment
fungicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
no deleterious effecte0
Qualifier
blight was not recordede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In experiments where blight was not recorded, fungicide treatments had no deleterious effect on yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1749 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatment had no effect on tuber blight at harvest.

Organ / stage
tubere0
Treatment
fungicide treatmente0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanst0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of tuber blighte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no effect of fungicide treatment on the incidence of tuber blight at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fungicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.