Abstract
In order to evaluate the effects of seed priming on morpho-physiological traits of winter wheat under drought stress, an experiment was conducted under semi–controlled conditions in the city of Ooshnaviyeh of Iran, during 2011-2012. This Study was carried out Factorial experiment based on RCBD design with 3 replications to determine the influence of Irrigation (normal and drought stress) and Priming control (with no priming), Ascrobat and hardening. Analysis of variance showed effect of irrigation on all characters except for 1000-grain weight and priming effect for all traits studied was significant. Also the interaction between priming and irrigation effects on Photosynthesis, Peduncle length, number grain per spike, number spike/m -2 was statistically significant. In this research drought significantly reduced all traits, as drought stress reduced grain yield 7.16% in comparison with control. Furthermore priming with Ascrobat increased plant height, photosynthesis, number spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison with other treatments so that the priming with Ascrobat increased grain yield by 9% compared with control. Finally with regard to the compare mean of interaction between treatments it can be concluded, seed priming with Ascrobat modified the effect of drought stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation significantly affected all measured wheat traits except 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- all characters except for 1000-grain weighte0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Analysis of variance showed effect of irrigation on all characters except for 1000-grain weight and priming effect for all traits studied was significant.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming significantly affected all measured wheat traits.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- priminge0
- Outcome
- all traits studiede0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Analysis of variance showed effect of irrigation on all characters except for 1000-grain weight and priming effect for all traits studied was significant.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming and irrigation interacted significantly for wheat photosynthesis.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- priming and irrigatione0
- Outcome
- Photosynthesise0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“interaction between priming and irrigation effects on Photosynthesis, Peduncle length, number grain per spike, number spike/m -2 was statistically significant.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming and irrigation interacted significantly for wheat peduncle length, grains per spike, and spikes per area.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- priming and irrigatione0
- Outcome
- Peduncle length, number grain per spike, number spike/m -2e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“interaction between priming and irrigation effects on Photosynthesis, Peduncle length, number grain per spike, number spike/m -2 was statistically significant.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly reduced measured wheat traits.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- droughte0
- Outcome
- all traitse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In this research drought significantly reduced all traits, as drought stress reduced grain yield 7.16% in comparison with control.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced wheat grain yield by 7.16% relative to control.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- drought stresse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 7.16%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“drought stress reduced grain yield 7.16% in comparison with control.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ascrobat priming increased wheat plant height and photosynthesis relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- priming with Ascrobate0
- Outcome
- plant height, photosynthesise0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“priming with Ascrobat increased plant height, photosynthesis, number spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison with other treatments”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ascrobat priming increased wheat spikelets per spike and 1000-grain weight relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- priming with Ascrobate0
- Outcome
- number spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight (TKW)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“priming with Ascrobat increased plant height, photosynthesis, number spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison with other treatments”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ascrobat priming increased wheat grain yield by 9% relative to control.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- priming with Ascrobate0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“priming with Ascrobat increased grain yield by 9% compared with control.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude Ascrobat priming modified the effect of drought on wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- seed priming with Ascrobate0
- Outcome
- effect of drought stresse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“seed priming with Ascrobat modified the effect of drought stress.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
seed treatment · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
297 papers more in this group
See all 301 papers →drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
628 papers more in this group
See all 632 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.