Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Effect of seed priming on morpho-physiological traits of wheat in drought stress conditions

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effects of seed priming on morpho-physiological traits of winter wheat under drought stress, an experiment was conducted under semi–controlled conditions in the city of Ooshnaviyeh of Iran, during 2011-2012. This Study was carried out Factorial experiment based on RCBD design with 3 replications to determine the influence of Irrigation (normal and drought stress) and Priming control (with no priming), Ascrobat and hardening. Analysis of variance showed effect of irrigation on all characters except for 1000-grain weight and priming effect for all traits studied was significant. Also the interaction between priming and irrigation effects on Photosynthesis, Peduncle length, number grain per spike, number spike/m -2 was statistically significant. In this research drought significantly reduced all traits, as drought stress reduced grain yield 7.16% in comparison with control. Furthermore priming with Ascrobat increased plant height, photosynthesis, number spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison with other treatments so that the priming with Ascrobat increased grain yield by 9% compared with control. Finally with regard to the compare mean of interaction between treatments it can be concluded, seed priming with Ascrobat modified the effect of drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly affected all measured wheat traits except 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
all characters except for 1000-grain weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance showed effect of irrigation on all characters except for 1000-grain weight and priming effect for all traits studied was significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming significantly affected all measured wheat traits.

Treatment
priminge0
Outcome
all traits studiede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance showed effect of irrigation on all characters except for 1000-grain weight and priming effect for all traits studied was significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming and irrigation interacted significantly for wheat photosynthesis.

Treatment
priming and irrigatione0
Outcome
Photosynthesise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between priming and irrigation effects on Photosynthesis, Peduncle length, number grain per spike, number spike/m -2 was statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming and irrigation interacted significantly for wheat peduncle length, grains per spike, and spikes per area.

Treatment
priming and irrigatione0
Outcome
Peduncle length, number grain per spike, number spike/m -2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between priming and irrigation effects on Photosynthesis, Peduncle length, number grain per spike, number spike/m -2 was statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced measured wheat traits.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
all traitse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this research drought significantly reduced all traits, as drought stress reduced grain yield 7.16% in comparison with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced wheat grain yield by 7.16% relative to control.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.16%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress reduced grain yield 7.16% in comparison with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascrobat priming increased wheat plant height and photosynthesis relative to other treatments.

Treatment
priming with Ascrobate0
Outcome
plant height, photosynthesise0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming with Ascrobat increased plant height, photosynthesis, number spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascrobat priming increased wheat spikelets per spike and 1000-grain weight relative to other treatments.

Treatment
priming with Ascrobate0
Outcome
number spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight (TKW)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming with Ascrobat increased plant height, photosynthesis, number spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascrobat priming increased wheat grain yield by 9% relative to control.

Treatment
priming with Ascrobate0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming with Ascrobat increased grain yield by 9% compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude Ascrobat priming modified the effect of drought on wheat.

Treatment
seed priming with Ascrobate0
Outcome
effect of drought stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming with Ascrobat modified the effect of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.