Paper · 2007 · Biocontrol Science and Technology

Potential for control of seedling blight of wheat caused byFusarium graminearumand related species using the bacterial endophyteBacillus mojavensis

Charles W. Bacon; Dorothy M. Hinton

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Fusarium-infected wheat seed decreases germination, seedling emergence, and causes post emergence seedling death, and can contribute to wheat scab and ear rot of maize, with consequent production of mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Current seed treatments have proved ineffective in controlling seedling blight and scab. A patented endophytic bacterial strain, Bacillus mojavensis RRC 101, and several other strains of this species were studied to determine in vitro antagonism to some Fusarium species and to assess the potential of this bacterium to serve as an endophytic biocontrol for seedling blight of wheat produced by species within the F. graminearum complex, as well as other species of Fusarium. Seedling emergence and seed germination were two tests used as indicators of seedling blight. These tests were conducted in growth rooms with two wheat cultivars highly susceptible to scab, Norm and Pioneer 2552, and other cultivars with varying resistance to scab. The results indicated that all strains of this bacterium were antagonistic in vitro to the strains of F. graminearum and its seven related species, as well as four strains of F. pseudograminearum and the two strains of F. verticillioides. Germination of the highly scab susceptible cultivar 2552 was increased from 77 to 97% when planted in soil containing a mixed inoculum of F. graminearum and related species. Seedling emergence in the very susceptible wheat cultivar Norm increased from 20 to 82% when treated with the bacterium. The data indicated that inoculating wheat kernels with B. mojavensis reduced seedling blight of wheat produced by F. graminearum and related Fusarium species indicating the potential for this bacterium as a biocontrol under field condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus mojavensis strains antagonized the tested Fusarium strains in vitro.

Taxon
Bacillus mojavensisBacillus mojavensist0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0
Outcome
antagonistic in vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all strains of this bacterium were antagonistic in vitro to the strains of F. graminearum and its seven related species, as well as four strains of F. pseudograminearum and the two strains of F. verticillioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus mojavensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment increased cultivar 2552 germination from 77 to 97% in Fusarium infested soil.

Material
2552e0
Treatment
mixed inoculum of F. graminearum and related speciese0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
77 to 97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of the highly scab susceptible cultivar 2552 was increased from 77 to 97% when planted in soil containing a mixed inoculum of F. graminearum and related species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment increased emergence of cultivar Norm from 20 to 82%.

Material
Norme0
Treatment
the bacteriume0
Outcome
Seedling emergencee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 to 82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling emergence in the very susceptible wheat cultivar Norm increased from 20 to 82% when treated with the bacterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculating wheat kernels with B. mojavensis reduced seedling blight caused by Fusarium.

Treatment
inoculating wheat kernels with B. mojavensise0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
B. mojavensisBacillus mojavensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seedling blight of wheate0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating wheat kernels with B. mojavensis reduced seedling blight of wheat produced by F. graminearum and related Fusarium species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1692 · show in text ↑

Fusarium graminearum · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 14 positive, 11 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.