Paper · 2015 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

The impact of elevated CO2 and temperature on grain quality of rice grown under open‐air field conditions

Liquan Jing; Juan Wang; Shibo Shen; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
62
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rising atmospheric CO2 is accompanied by global warming. However, interactive effects of elevated CO2 and temperature have not been well studied on grain quality of rice. A japonica cultivar was grown in the field using a free-air CO2 enrichment facility in combination with a canopy air temperature increase system in 2014. The gas fumigation (200 µmol mol(-1) above ambient CO2 ) and temperature increase (1 °C above ambient air temperature) were performed from tillering until maturity. RESULTS: Compared with the control (ambient CO2 and air temperature), elevated CO2 increased grain length and width as well as grain chalkiness but decreased protein concentrations. In contrast, the increase in canopy air temperature had less effect on these parameters except for grain chalkiness. The starch pasting properties of rice flour and taste analysis of cooked rice indicated that the palatability of rice was improved by CO2 and/or temperature elevation, with the combination of the two treatments showing the most significant changes compared with ambient rice. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that projected CO2 in 2050 may have larger effects on rice grain quality than the projected temperature increase. Although deterioration in milling suitability, grain appearance and nutritional quality can be expected, the taste of cooked rice might be better in the future environment. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased rice grain length and width relative to ambient conditions.

Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
grain length and widthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 and air temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with the control (ambient CO2 and air temperature), elevated CO2 increased grain length and width as well as grain chalkiness but decreased protein concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased rice grain chalkiness.

Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
grain chalkinesse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 and air temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with the control (ambient CO2 and air temperature), elevated CO2 increased grain length and width as well as grain chalkiness but decreased protein concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased rice grain protein concentrations.

Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
protein concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 and air temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with the control (ambient CO2 and air temperature), elevated CO2 increased grain length and width as well as grain chalkiness but decreased protein concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher canopy temperature had less effect on rice grain length, width and protein than elevated CO2.

Treatment
increase in canopy air temperaturee0
Outcome
grain length and widthe1
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
elevated CO2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“In contrast, the increase in canopy air temperature had less effect on these parameters except for grain chalkiness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“elevated CO2 increased grain length and width as well as grain chalkiness but decreased protein concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy temperature increase affected rice grain chalkiness.

Treatment
increase in canopy air temperaturee0
Outcome
grain chalkinesse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“In contrast, the increase in canopy air temperature had less effect on these parameters except for grain chalkiness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 and/or temperature elevation improved rice palatability, with the combined treatments showing the largest change.

Treatment
CO2 and/or temperature elevatione0
Outcome
palatability of ricee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
combination of the two treatments showing the most significant changese0
Comparator
ambient ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The starch pasting properties of rice flour and taste analysis of cooked rice indicated that the palatability of rice was improved by CO2 and/or temperature elevation, with the combination of the two treatments showing the most significant changes compared with ambient rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1076 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expect projected 2050 CO2 to affect rice grain quality more than projected temperature rise.

Outcome
rice grain qualitye0
Direction
larger effectse0
Comparator
projected temperature increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“projected CO2 in 2050 may have larger effects on rice grain quality than the projected temperature increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1217 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expect worse milling suitability, grain appearance and nutritional quality in future conditions.

Outcome
milling suitability, grain appearance and nutritional qualitye0
Direction
deterioratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“deterioration in milling suitability, grain appearance and nutritional quality can be expected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1322 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest cooked rice taste may improve in the future environment.

Outcome
taste of cooked ricee0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
future environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the taste of cooked rice might be better in the future environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1390 · show in text ↑

co2 · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

co2 · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.