Paper · 2009 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Evaluation of Soyscreen in an Oil-Based Formulation for UV Protection of Beauveria bassiana Conidia

Robert W. Behle; David L. Compton; Joseph A. Laszlo; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soyscreen oil was studied as a formulation ingredient to protect Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin conidia from UV degradation. Feruloylated soy glycerides, referred to as Soyscreen oil, are biobased UV-absorbing molecules made by combining molecules of soybean oil with ferulic acid. Conidia stored in Soyscreen oil for 28 wk at 25, 30, and 35 degrees C retained viability as well as conidia stored in sunflower oil, demonstrating that Soyscreen did not adversely affect viability with prolonged storage. For samples applied to glass and exposed to simulated sunlight (xenon light), conidia in sunflower oil with or without sunscreens (Soyscreen or oxyl methoxycinnimate) had similar conidia viability after exposure. These oil formulations retained conidia viability better than conidia applied as an aqueous treatment. However, the 10% Soyscreen oil formulation applied to field grown cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants, did not improve residual insecticidal activity compared with aqueous applications of unformulated conidia or two commercial formulations when assayed against Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) larvae. Our results suggest that the oil applications lose UV protection because the oil was absorbed by the leaf. This conclusion was supported in subsequent laboratory exposures of conidia in oil-based formulations with UV screens applied to cabbage leaves or balsa wood, which lost protection as measured by decreased viability of conidia when exposed to simulated sunlight. As a result, additional formulation techniques such as encapsulation to prevent separation of the protective oil from the conidia may be required to extend protection when oil formulations are applied in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage of conidia in Soyscreen oil for 28 weeks at 25, 30 and 35 C did not adversely affect conidia viability, which was as high as in sunflower oil.

Treatment
stored in Soyscreen oile1
Outcome
viabilitye1
Direction
retainede1
Qualifier
for 28 wk at 25, 30, and 35 degrees Ce1
Comparator
sunflower oile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Conidia stored in Soyscreen oil for 28 wk at 25, 30, and 35 degrees C retained viability as well as conidia stored in sunflower oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–421 · show in text ↑
e2

“the 10% Soyscreen oil formulation applied to field grown cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On glass under simulated sunlight, conidia in sunflower oil with or without sunscreens had similar viability after exposure.

Treatment
sunflower oil with or without sunscreense3
Outcome
conidia viability after exposuree3
Direction
similare3
Comparator
without sunscreense3
Setting
simulated sunlight (xenon light)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the 10% Soyscreen oil formulation applied to field grown cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
e3

“For samples applied to glass and exposed to simulated sunlight (xenon light), conidia in sunflower oil with or without sunscreens (Soyscreen or oxyl methoxycinnimate) had similar conidia viability after exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 10% Soyscreen oil formulation on field cabbage and bean did not improve residual insecticidal activity against Trichoplusia ni larvae compared with aqueous unformulated conidia or two commercial formulations.

Treatment
10% Soyscreen oil formulatione2
Interactor
Trichoplusia niTrichoplusia nie3pest
Second interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
residual insecticidal activitye3
Direction
did not improvee3
Comparator
aqueous applications of unformulated conidiae3
Setting
fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoplusia ni
Trichoplusia ni · InteractorWhitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soyscreen oil was studied as a formulation ingredient to protect Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin conidia from UV degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“the 10% Soyscreen oil formulation applied to field grown cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
e3

“did not improve residual insecticidal activity compared with aqueous applications of unformulated conidia or two commercial formulations when assayed against Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidia in oil-based UV-screen formulations applied to cabbage leaves or balsa wood lost protection, with decreased viability under simulated sunlight in the laboratory.

Treatment
oil-based formulations with UV screense4
Outcome
viability of conidiae4
Direction
decreasede4
Setting
laboratorye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“laboratory exposures of conidia in oil-based formulations with UV screens applied to cabbage leaves or balsa wood, which lost protection as measured by decreased viability of conidia when exposed to simulated sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1524 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oil applications lose UV protection, which the authors suggest is because the oil is absorbed by the leaf.

Outcome
UV protectione5
Qualifier
because the oil was absorbed by the leafe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the 10% Soyscreen oil formulation applied to field grown cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
e5

“Our results suggest that the oil applications lose UV protection because the oil was absorbed by the leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1261 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Encapsulation or other formulation techniques may be required to extend protection when oil formulations are applied in the field.

Outcome
extend protectione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the 10% Soyscreen oil formulation applied to field grown cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
e6

“additional formulation techniques such as encapsulation to prevent separation of the protective oil from the conidia may be required to extend protection when oil formulations are applied in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil formulations retained conidia viability better than aqueous applications of conidia.

Treatment
oil formulationse7
Outcome
conidia viabilitye7
Direction
bettere7
Comparator
conidia applied as an aqueous treatmente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the 10% Soyscreen oil formulation applied to field grown cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
e7

“These oil formulations retained conidia viability better than conidia applied as an aqueous treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–825 · show in text ↑

uv · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

storage · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.