Paper · 2016 · HortScience

Investigation of Soy Protein–based Biostimulant Seed Coating for Broccoli Seedling and Plant Growth Enhancement

Masoume Amirkhani; Anil N. Netravali; Wencheng Huang; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
79
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This research presents a novel method of using plant-derived protein hydrolysates as seed coating materials. The objective of this study was to develop seed coating formulations using soy flour, a sustainable, inexpensive, and green source, as a biostimulant using broccoli as the model system. A 10% suspension of soy flour was used as the seed treatment binder in all coatings. The solid particulate filler was composed of mixtures of soy flour, cellulose, and diatomaceous earth, together termed as SCD. All SCD components were homogenized in water, then dried and ground to a fine particle size <106 µm. The SCD coatings were applied with rotary pan seed coating equipment at 25% of the seed weight. Increasing the proportion of soy flour increased the seed coating strength and also the time for the coating to disintegrate after soaking in water. As a result, the seed coatings reduced the percentage germination and the germination rate compared with the nontreated control. However, the 10-day-old seedling root and shoot growth showed significant improvement for all SCD coating treatments compared with controls. Plant growth and development was also measured after 30 days in the greenhouse. Fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), leaf area, plant height, leaf development, Soil-Plant Analyses Development (SPAD) index (chlorophyll measurement), and nitrogen (N) per plant were all greater from coatings with 30%, 40%, and 50% soy flour than the noncoated control. Nitrogen, from the soy flour applied in the seed coatings, ranged from 0.024 to 0.073 mg per seed, while the enhanced N per plant ranged from 1.7 to 8.5 mg. The coating treatment with 0.063 mg N per seed resulted in the greatest plant leaf area and highest N content. Nitrogen applied in the seed coating only accounted for 1% to 2% of the enhanced N in the plants, indicating the soy flour acted as a biostimulant rather than a fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soy flour seed coatings reduced germination percentage and germination rate compared with nontreated control

Treatment
seed coatingse1
Outcome
percentage germination and the germination ratee1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
nontreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“As a result, the seed coatings reduced the percentage germination and the germination rate compared with the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SCD coatings significantly improved 10-day-old seedling root and shoot growth compared with controls

Treatment
SCD coating treatmentse2
Outcome
10-day-old seedling root and shoot growthe2
Direction
improvemente2
Comparator
controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e2

“the 10-day-old seedling root and shoot growth showed significant improvement for all SCD coating treatments compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings with 30%, 40% and 50% soy flour increased fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area relative to noncoated control

Treatment
coatings with 30%, 40%, and 50% soy floure3
Outcome
Fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), leaf areae3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
noncoated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), leaf area, plant height, leaf development, Soil-Plant Analyses Development (SPAD) index (chlorophyll measurement), and nitrogen (N) per plant were all greater from coatings with 30%, 40%, and 50% soy flour than the noncoated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings with 30%, 40% and 50% soy flour increased plant height, leaf development and SPAD index relative to noncoated control

Treatment
coatings with 30%, 40%, and 50% soy floure3
Outcome
plant height, leaf development, Soil-Plant Analyses Development (SPAD) index (chlorophyll measurement)e3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
noncoated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), leaf area, plant height, leaf development, Soil-Plant Analyses Development (SPAD) index (chlorophyll measurement), and nitrogen (N) per plant were all greater from coatings with 30%, 40%, and 50% soy flour than the noncoated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1474 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced nitrogen per plant ranged from 1.7 to 8.5 mg in soy flour coated plants

Outcome
enhanced N per plante6
Value
1.7 to 8.5 mge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e6

“while the enhanced N per plant ranged from 1.7 to 8.5 mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.063 mg N per seed coating treatment gave the greatest plant leaf area

Treatment
0.063 mg N per seede4
Outcome
plant leaf areae4
Direction
greateste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e4

“The coating treatment with 0.063 mg N per seed resulted in the greatest plant leaf area and highest N content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.063 mg N per seed coating treatment gave the highest N content in plants

Treatment
0.063 mg N per seede4
Outcome
N contente4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e4

“The coating treatment with 0.063 mg N per seed resulted in the greatest plant leaf area and highest N content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1742 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soy flour acted as a biostimulant rather than a fertilizer, as coating nitrogen accounted for only 1% to 2% of enhanced plant N

Treatment
Nitrogen applied in the seed coatinge7
Outcome
enhanced N in the plantse7
Value
1% to 2%e7
Qualifier
soy flour acted as a biostimulant rather than a fertilizere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen applied in the seed coating only accounted for 1% to 2% of the enhanced N in the plants, indicating the soy flour acted as a biostimulant rather than a fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the proportion of soy flour increased seed coating strength

Treatment
proportion of soy floure5
Outcome
seed coating strengthe5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing the proportion of soy flour increased the seed coating strength and also the time for the coating to disintegrate after soaking in water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the proportion of soy flour increased the time for the coating to disintegrate after soaking in water

Treatment
proportion of soy floure5
Outcome
the time for the coating to disintegratee5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using broccoli as the model system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–293 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing the proportion of soy flour increased the seed coating strength and also the time for the coating to disintegrate after soaking in water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–851 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 24 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.