Abstract
The germination tests for the pelleted pakchoi and cauliflower seeds were conducted. The laboratory experiment showed that their germination vigors and rates,seedling heights and root lengths were not significantly different from those of the control,and after two years of dry storage in normal temperature,the pelleted seeds did not decrease in germination vigor and rate.The field trial showed that applying botanical pesticide to vegetable seed pelletization reduced the incidence of damping-off in pakchoi and cauliflower seedlings and the damage by black cutworms.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Pelleted pakchoi seeds showed no significant difference in germination vigor, rate, seedling height or root length versus controls.
Verbatim
e0“The germination tests for the pelleted pakchoi and cauliflower seeds were conducted. The laboratory experiment showed that their germination vigors and rates,seedling heights and root lengths were not significantly different from those of the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pelleted cauliflower seeds showed no significant difference in germination vigor, rate, seedling height or root length versus controls.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Treatment
- pelletede0
- Outcome
- germination vigors and rates,seedling heights and root lengthse0
- Direction
- not significantly differente0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The germination tests for the pelleted pakchoi and cauliflower seeds were conducted. The laboratory experiment showed that their germination vigors and rates,seedling heights and root lengths were not significantly different from those of the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Two years of dry storage did not lower pellet seed germination vigor or rate.
- Taxon
- pakchoi and cauliflowere1
- Treatment
- two years of dry storage in normal temperaturee0
- Outcome
- germination vigor and ratee0
- Direction
- did not decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“after two years of dry storage in normal temperature,the pelleted seeds did not decrease in germination vigor and rate”
e1“pakchoi and cauliflower seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Botanical pesticide pellets reduced damping-off in pakchoi seedlings in the field.
- Taxon
- pakchoie0
- Treatment
- applying botanical pesticide to vegetable seed pelletizatione0
- Outcome
- incidence of damping-offe0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“applying botanical pesticide to vegetable seed pelletization reduced the incidence of damping-off in pakchoi and cauliflower seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Botanical pesticide pellets reduced damping-off in cauliflower seedlings in the field.
- Taxon
- cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytise0
- Treatment
- applying botanical pesticide to vegetable seed pelletizatione0
- Outcome
- incidence of damping-offe0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“applying botanical pesticide to vegetable seed pelletization reduced the incidence of damping-off in pakchoi and cauliflower seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Botanical pesticide pellets reduced black cutworm damage.
- Taxon
- pakchoi and cauliflowere0
- Treatment
- applying botanical pesticide to vegetable seed pelletizatione0
- Interactor
- black cutwormse0pest
- Outcome
- damage by black cutwormse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“applying botanical pesticide to vegetable seed pelletization reduced the incidence of damping-off in pakchoi and cauliflower seedlings and the damage by black cutworms”
The same questions in other papers
storage · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
insecticide · pest · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →botanical · pest · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →botanical · disease · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →botanical · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →storage · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →insecticide · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →botanical · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.