Abstract
The results showed that the methanol extract from Clausena lansium was very effective against the growth of the Brassica campestris under light and non-light.At the concentration of 4 mg/mL,the inhibition to root,shoot and wet weigh were 99.17%,99.20%,72.42% respectively after lighting 3 h,which was higher than the non-light97.18%,82.07%,69.35%.Results of toxicology showed that the IC_(50) were 0.44 mg/mL under light and 0.48 mg/mL under non-light respectively;the IC_(50) to shoot was 0.99 mg/mL under light and 1.44 mg/mL under non-light;the IC_(50) to wet weigh was 1.48 mg/mL under light and 1.51 mg/mL under non-light;and the correlation coefficient was all above 0.90.Preliminaryly seperated the extract and the results indicated that the extract of ethyl acetate was the best.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Under light, 4 mg/mL methanol extract inhibited Brassica campestris root growth by 99.17%.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestris
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0 - Treatment
- methanol extract from Clausena lansiume0
- Outcome
- inhibition to roote1
- Direction
- inhibitione1
- Value
- 99.17%e1
- Qualifier
- after lighting 3 he1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the methanol extract from Clausena lansium was very effective against the growth of the Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“At the concentration of 4 mg/mL,the inhibition to root,shoot and wet weigh were 99.17%,99.20%,72.42% respectively after lighting 3 h”
Claim · model-written summary
Under light, 4 mg/mL methanol extract inhibited shoot growth by 99.20%.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Treatment
- methanol extract from Clausena lansiume0
- Outcome
- inhibition to root,shoot and wet weighe1
- Direction
- inhibitione1
- Value
- 99.20%e1
- Qualifier
- after lighting 3 he1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the methanol extract from Clausena lansium was very effective against the growth of the Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“At the concentration of 4 mg/mL,the inhibition to root,shoot and wet weigh were 99.17%,99.20%,72.42% respectively after lighting 3 h”
Claim · model-written summary
Under light, 4 mg/mL methanol extract inhibited wet weight by 72.42%.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Treatment
- methanol extract from Clausena lansiume0
- Outcome
- wet weighe1
- Direction
- inhibitione1
- Value
- 72.42%e1
- Qualifier
- after lighting 3 he1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the methanol extract from Clausena lansium was very effective against the growth of the Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“At the concentration of 4 mg/mL,the inhibition to root,shoot and wet weigh were 99.17%,99.20%,72.42% respectively after lighting 3 h”
Claim · model-written summary
Without light, root inhibition was 97.18%, lower than under light.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Treatment
- methanol extract from Clausena lansiume3
- Outcome
- inhibition to roote2
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 97.18%e1
- Comparator
- lighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“methanol extract from Clausena lansium”
e0“the growth of the Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“which was higher than the non-light97.18%,82.07%,69.35%”
e2“At the concentration of 4 mg/mL,the inhibition to root,shoot and wet weigh were 99.17%,99.20%,72.42% respectively after lighting 3 h”
Claim · model-written summary
Without light, shoot inhibition was 82.07%, lower than under light.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Treatment
- methanol extract from Clausena lansiume3
- Outcome
- shoote2
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 82.07%e1
- Comparator
- lighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“methanol extract from Clausena lansium”
e0“the growth of the Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“which was higher than the non-light97.18%,82.07%,69.35%”
e2“At the concentration of 4 mg/mL,the inhibition to root,shoot and wet weigh were 99.17%,99.20%,72.42% respectively after lighting 3 h”
Claim · model-written summary
Without light, wet weight inhibition was 69.35%, lower than under light.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Treatment
- methanol extract from Clausena lansiume3
- Outcome
- wet weighe2
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 69.35%e1
- Comparator
- lighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“methanol extract from Clausena lansium”
e0“the growth of the Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“which was higher than the non-light97.18%,82.07%,69.35%”
e2“At the concentration of 4 mg/mL,the inhibition to root,shoot and wet weigh were 99.17%,99.20%,72.42% respectively after lighting 3 h”
Claim · model-written summary
Root IC50 under light was 0.44 mg/mL.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Outcome
- IC_(50)e1
- Value
- 0.44 mg/mLe1
- Qualifier
- under lighte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“the IC_(50) were 0.44 mg/mL under light and 0.48 mg/mL under non-light respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Root IC50 without light was 0.48 mg/mL.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Outcome
- IC_(50)e1
- Value
- 0.48 mg/mLe1
- Qualifier
- under non-lighte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“the IC_(50) were 0.44 mg/mL under light and 0.48 mg/mL under non-light respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot IC50 under light was 0.99 mg/mL.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Outcome
- IC_(50) to shoote1
- Value
- 0.99 mg/mLe1
- Qualifier
- under lighte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“the IC_(50) to shoot was 0.99 mg/mL under light and 1.44 mg/mL under non-light”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot IC50 without light was 1.44 mg/mL.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Outcome
- IC_(50) to shoote1
- Value
- 1.44 mg/mLe1
- Qualifier
- under non-lighte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“the IC_(50) to shoot was 0.99 mg/mL under light and 1.44 mg/mL under non-light”
Claim · model-written summary
Wet weight IC50 under light was 1.48 mg/mL.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Outcome
- IC_(50) to wet weighe1
- Value
- 1.48 mg/mLe1
- Qualifier
- under lighte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“the IC_(50) to wet weigh was 1.48 mg/mL under light and 1.51 mg/mL under non-light”
Claim · model-written summary
Wet weight IC50 without light was 1.51 mg/mL.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Outcome
- IC_(50) to wet weighe1
- Value
- 1.51 mg/mLe1
- Qualifier
- under non-lighte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“the IC_(50) to wet weigh was 1.48 mg/mL under light and 1.51 mg/mL under non-light”
Claim · model-written summary
Dose-response correlation coefficients were all above 0.90.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Outcome
- correlation coefficiente1
- Value
- above 0.90e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“the correlation coefficient was all above 0.90”
Claim · model-written summary
The ethyl acetate fraction was the most active fraction.
- Taxon
- Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
- Treatment
- extract of ethyl acetatee1
- Outcome
- the beste1
- Direction
- the beste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Brassica campestris under light and non-light”
e1“the extract of ethyl acetate was the best”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · disease · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →botanical · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.