Paper · 2015 · Agrosearch

The effect of indole acetic acid on the performance of maize (Zea maysl.)in a Southern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria

EK Eifediyi; SU Remison

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Poor soil fertility and nutrient depletion continue to present huge challenges to successful crop production in southern Guinea savanna zone of Nigeria. Consequently, a study was conducted at Ilorin - Nigeria in a southern Guinea savanna zone during the wet seasons of 2012 and 2013 to evaluate the effects of indole acetic acid (IAA), a growth regulator, on the growth and yield of maize and its economic implications. The treatments imposed were five rates of IAA (0, 200, 400, 600 and 800 ppm) using a randomized complete block design replicated three times. A basal NPK fertilizer was applied at 3WAP and IAA was applied at the primary leaf stage foliarly. Data were collected on growth parameters and grain yield of maize. Analyses of variance (ANOVA) for all observations were performed and mean separation was done by using the least significant difference (LSD). Cost benefit analysis was also determined. The result of the experiment indicated that using IAA significantly (P<0.05) increased growth and grain yield of maize from 3300 to 3957.9kgha-1 but the result of economic analysis indicated that the control produced the highest net returns (N225,130 in 2012 and N232,959.00 in 2013) and was more economical because of high cost of indole acetic acid for maize cultivation.Keywords: maize, growth regulator, growth, grain yieldand net returns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA significantly increased maize growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Southern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeriat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using IAA significantly (P<0.05) increased growth and grain yield of maize from 3300 to 3957.9kgha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA significantly increased maize grain yield from 3300 to 3957.9kgha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3957.9kgha-1e0
Qualifier
3300e0
Setting
Southern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeriat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using IAA significantly (P<0.05) increased growth and grain yield of maize from 3300 to 3957.9kgha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the highest net returns in 2012.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
N225,130e0
Qualifier
2012e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control produced the highest net returns (N225,130 in 2012 and N232,959.00 in 2013)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the highest net returns in 2013.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
N232,959.00e0
Qualifier
2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control produced the highest net returns (N225,130 in 2012 and N232,959.00 in 2013)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control was more economical because IAA was costly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
more economicale0
Qualifier
high cost of indole acetic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was more economical because of high cost of indole acetic acid for maize cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑

indole-3-acetic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.