Paper · 2012 · HortScience

Roller Type and Operating Speed Effects on Rye Termination Rates, Soil Moisture, and Yield of Sweet Corn in a No-till System

Ted S. Kornecki; Francisco J. Arriaga; Andrew J. Price

20
claims
30
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in Cullman, AL, to evaluate the effects of three different rollers/crimpers on the termination of a rye ( Secale cereale L) winter cover crop, soil moisture, and yield of sweet corn ( Zea mays saccharata L.) in a no-till system. The following roller types were tested: a straight bar roller, a smooth roller with crimper, and a two-stage roller. These rollers were tested at operating speeds of 3.2 km·h −1 and 6.4 km·h −1 . The three rollers/crimpers were compared with a smooth drum roller (no crimping bars) plus glyphosate applied at rate 1.0 kg·ha −1 used as a control. Rye termination dates were selected to be 3 weeks before the recommended sweet corn planting date, which is in the beginning of May for this region. Data indicate that at 3 weeks after rolling for all seasons (2006–2008), 100% rye termination was reached with the smooth drum roller and glyphosate. Two weeks after rolling, average rye termination rates by rollers/crimpers alone were 54.6%, 30.0%, and 50.4% in 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. Three weeks after rolling, rye termination rates increased only by ≈10% compared with 2 weeks after rolling. These termination levels were below the recommended rate of 90% termination necessary for planting a cash crop into the cover residue. Lower rye termination was probably caused by rolling the rye in an early growth stage (flowering stage). The rollers’ operating speed did not influence rye termination rates. Similarly, roller type did not affect soil moisture during the first and second week after rolling. Applying glyphosate with rolling did not increase yield of sweet corn in any of the three growing seasons, and in 2006, sweet corn yield was lower compared with the roller alone treatments. These results are important to vegetable organic systems, in which use of herbicides is not allowed. No significant difference in sweet corn yield was found between operating speeds of 3.2 km·h −1 vs. 6.4 km·h −1 and between the assigned treatments in all growing seasons. However, significant differences in sweet corn yield were detected between the years, most likely as a result of different weather patterns. The lowest sweet corn yield of 3513 kg·ha −1 was reported in 2007 as a result of severe drought in spring and summer of 2007. The highest yield of 15,613 kg·ha −1 was recorded in 2006. In 2008, the yield was 10,158 kg·ha −1 . Although the different roller designs were not as effective in ending the rye cover crop compared with the glyphosate treatment, sweet corn yields were unaffected. Multiple rolling operations over the same area could be useful if greater rye termination levels are required without the use of a herbicide, but this recommendation should be tested experimentally in more detail.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smooth drum rolling with glyphosate achieved complete rye termination after three weeks.

Treatment
smooth drum roller and glyphosatee0
Outcome
rye terminatione0
Direction
reachede0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
3 weeks after rolling for all seasons (2006–2008)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 3 weeks after rolling for all seasons (2006–2008), 100% rye termination was reached with the smooth drum roller and glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–905 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L) winter cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rollers alone terminated 54.6% of rye after two weeks in 2006.

Treatment
rollers/crimpers alonee0
Outcome
rye termination ratese0
Value
54.6%e0
Qualifier
2006e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two weeks after rolling, average rye termination rates by rollers/crimpers alone were 54.6%, 30.0%, and 50.4% in 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L) winter cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rollers alone terminated 30.0% of rye after two weeks in 2007.

Treatment
rollers/crimpers alonee0
Outcome
rye termination ratese0
Value
30.0%e0
Qualifier
2007e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two weeks after rolling, average rye termination rates by rollers/crimpers alone were 54.6%, 30.0%, and 50.4% in 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L) winter cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rollers alone terminated 50.4% of rye after two weeks in 2008.

Treatment
rollers/crimpers alonee0
Outcome
rye termination ratese0
Value
50.4%e0
Qualifier
2008e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two weeks after rolling, average rye termination rates by rollers/crimpers alone were 54.6%, 30.0%, and 50.4% in 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L) winter cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye termination increased by about 10% between two and three weeks after rolling.

Outcome
rye termination ratese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
≈10%e0
Comparator
2 weeks after rollinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three weeks after rolling, rye termination rates increased only by ≈10% compared with 2 weeks after rolling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roller-only rye termination stayed below the 90% level recommended before cash-crop planting.

Outcome
termination levelse0
Direction
belowe0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
necessary for planting a cash crop into the cover residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These termination levels were below the recommended rate of 90% termination necessary for planting a cash crop into the cover residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three weeks after rolling, rye termination rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1104 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed early flowering-stage rolling as a probable cause of low rye termination.

Treatment
rolling the rye in an early growth stage (flowering stage)e0
Outcome
Lower rye terminatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower rye termination was probably caused by rolling the rye in an early growth stage (flowering stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roller operating speed did not influence rye termination rates.

Treatment
rollers’ operating speede0
Outcome
rye termination ratese0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rollers’ operating speed did not influence rye termination rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roller type did not affect soil moisture during the first two weeks after rolling.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
roller typee0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
first and second week after rollinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“roller type did not affect soil moisture during the first and second week after rolling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1573 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet corn ( Zea mays saccharata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding glyphosate to rolling did not increase sweet corn yield in any of the three seasons.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Applying glyphosate with rollinge0
Outcome
yield of sweet corne0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
any of the three growing seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Applying glyphosate with rolling did not increase yield of sweet corn in any of the three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2006, glyphosate plus rolling yielded less sweet corn than rolling alone.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Applying glyphosate with rollinge1
Outcome
sweet corn yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
2006e0
Comparator
roller alone treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“in 2006, sweet corn yield was lower compared with the roller alone treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1763 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying glyphosate with rolling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn yield did not differ significantly between the two roller speeds.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
3.2 km·h −1e0
Outcome
sweet corn yielde0
Direction
No significant differencee0
Comparator
6.4 km·h −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference in sweet corn yield was found between operating speeds of 3.2 km·h −1 vs. 6.4 km·h −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–1977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn yield did not differ significantly among the assigned treatments across seasons.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
assigned treatmentse0
Outcome
sweet corn yielde0
Direction
No significant differencee0
Qualifier
all growing seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference in sweet corn yield was found between operating speeds of 3.2 km·h −1 vs. 6.4 km·h −1 and between the assigned treatments in all growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–2036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn yield differed significantly among years.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Outcome
differences in sweet corn yielde0
Qualifier
most likely as a result of different weather patternse0
Comparator
between the yearse0

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences in sweet corn yield were detected between the years, most likely as a result of different weather patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2047–2177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest sweet corn yield was 3513 kg·ha −1 in drought-stricken 2007.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Outcome
sweet corn yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3513 kg·ha −1e0
Qualifier
severe drought in spring and summer of 2007e0

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest sweet corn yield of 3513 kg·ha −1 was reported in 2007 as a result of severe drought in spring and summer of 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2179–2303 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sweet corn yield was 15,613 kg·ha −1 in 2006.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15,613 kg·ha −1e0
Qualifier
2006e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of 15,613 kg·ha −1 was recorded in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2305–2362 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant differences in sweet corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2047–2090 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn yield was 10,158 kg·ha −1 in 2008.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Outcome
yielde0
Value
10,158 kg·ha −1e0
Qualifier
2008e0

Verbatim

e0

“In 2008, the yield was 10,158 kg·ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2364–2402 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant differences in sweet corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2047–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roller designs terminated less rye than the glyphosate treatment.

Treatment
different roller designse0
Outcome
ending the rye cover crope0
Direction
not as effectivee0
Comparator
glyphosate treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the different roller designs were not as effective in ending the rye cover crop compared with the glyphosate treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2414–2532 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn yields were unaffected despite poorer rye termination by roller designs.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
different roller designse1
Outcome
sweet corn yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn yields were unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2534–2567 · show in text ↑
e1

“different roller designs were not as effective in ending the rye cover crop compared with the glyphosate treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2418–2532 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest multiple rolling operations when greater rye termination is needed without herbicide, pending further testing.

Outcome
Multiple rolling operations over the same area could be usefule0
Qualifier
this recommendation should be tested experimentally in more detaile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiple rolling operations over the same area could be useful if greater rye termination levels are required without the use of a herbicide, but this recommendation should be tested experimentally in more detail”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2569–2781 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.