Paper · 2013 · HortScience

Grafting Improves Tomato Salinity Tolerance through Sodium Partitioning within the Shoot

Francesco Di Gioia; Angelo Signore; Francesco Serio; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two greenhouse experiments were carried out to analyze the shoot sodium (Na + ) partitioning, yield, and fruit quality of ‘Cuore di Bue’, a salt-sensitive heirloom tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.), ungrafted or grafted onto interspecific tomato hybrid rootstocks ( S. lycopersicum × S. habrochaites ) ‘Maxifort’ and ‘Arnold’ in 2009, ‘Arnold’ and ‘Armstrong’ in 2010, grown at different salinity stress (SS) levels (0, 20, and 40 m m of NaCl in 2009; 0 and 20 m m of NaCl in 2010). In both experiments, an interaction was observed between grafting combinations and SS levels in terms of fruit yield, and fruit juice Na + content. Under no SS conditions, plant grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ and ‘Armstrong’ provided the highest yield in 2009 and 2010 experiments, respectively. In the presence of 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ provided a marketable yield 23.5% (on average) higher than plants grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ or ungrafted in 2009 and 33% (on average) higher than plants grafted onto ‘Armstrong’ or ungrafted in 2010. The further increase of SS to 40 m m of NaCl considerably reduced the productivity of all grafting combinations. At 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ showed also a higher capacity to modulate shoot Na + partitioning with respect to ungrafted plants by increasing Na + accumulation in older leaves (52%) and reducing Na + content in younger and most active leaves (24%), thus enabling the maintenance of higher K + /Na + , Ca 2+ /Na + , and Mg 2+ /Na + ratios compared with ungrafted plants. Fruit total soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and dry matter were unaffected by grafting at any SS level, whereas under SS, the fruit juice Na + content of grafted plants was consistently lower (from 19% up to 68%) than that of ungrafted plants. Under moderate SS conditions (20 m m of NaCl), the use of rootstock genotypes such as ‘Arnold’ having a particular ability to reduce Na + accumulation in younger and most active leaves may increase tomato yield and enhance tomato nutritional value by reducing the fruit juice Na + content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting combination and salinity interacted for fruit yield.

Treatment
grafting combinationse0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Qualifier
SS levelse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both experiments, an interaction was observed between grafting combinations and SS levels in terms of fruit yield, and fruit juice Na + content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–630 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting combination and salinity interacted for fruit juice Na + content.

Treatment
grafting combinationse0
Outcome
fruit juice Na + contente0
Qualifier
SS levelse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both experiments, an interaction was observed between grafting combinations and SS levels in terms of fruit yield, and fruit juice Na + content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–630 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

‘Maxifort’ grafts had the highest yield without salinity in 2009.

Material
‘Maxifort’e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
2009e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under no SS conditions, plant grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ and ‘Armstrong’ provided the highest yield in 2009 and 2010 experiments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–771 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

‘Armstrong’ grafts had the highest yield without salinity in 2010.

Material
‘Armstrong’e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
2010e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under no SS conditions, plant grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ and ‘Armstrong’ provided the highest yield in 2009 and 2010 experiments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 m m NaCl, Arnold grafts yielded 23.5% more than ‘Maxifort’ or ungrafted in 2009.

Material
‘Arnold’e2
Treatment
grafted onto ‘Arnold’e2
Outcome
marketable yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
23.5%e2
Qualifier
2009e2
Comparator
‘Maxifort’ or ungraftede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the presence of 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ provided a marketable yield 23.5% (on average) higher than plants grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ or ungrafted in 2009 and 33% (on average) higher than plants grafted onto ‘Armstrong’ or ungrafted in 2010.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 m m NaCl, Arnold grafts yielded 33% more than ‘Armstrong’ or ungrafted in 2010.

Material
‘Arnold’e2
Treatment
grafted onto ‘Arnold’e2
Outcome
marketable yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
33%e2
Qualifier
2010e2
Comparator
‘Armstrong’ or ungraftede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the presence of 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ provided a marketable yield 23.5% (on average) higher than plants grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ or ungrafted in 2009 and 33% (on average) higher than plants grafted onto ‘Armstrong’ or ungrafted in 2010.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity to 40 m m NaCl reduced productivity across grafting combinations.

Treatment
40 m m of NaCle3
Outcome
productivitye3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e3

“The further increase of SS to 40 m m of NaCl considerably reduced the productivity of all grafting combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arnold grafts changed Na + accumulation in older leaves by 52% relative to ungrafted plants at 20 m m NaCl.

Organ / stage
older leavese4
Treatment
grafted onto ‘Arnold’e4
Outcome
Na + accumulatione4
Direction
increasinge4
Value
52%e4
Comparator
ungrafted plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e4

“At 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ showed also a higher capacity to modulate shoot Na + partitioning with respect to ungrafted plants by increasing Na + accumulation in older leaves (52%) and reducing Na + content in younger and most active leaves (24%), thus enabling the maintenance of higher K + /Na + , Ca 2+ /Na + , and Mg 2+ /Na + ratios compared with ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arnold grafts changed Na + content in younger and most active leaves by 24% relative to ungrafted plants at 20 m m NaCl.

Organ / stage
younger and most active leavese4
Treatment
grafted onto ‘Arnold’e4
Outcome
Na + contente4
Direction
reducinge4
Value
24%e4
Comparator
ungrafted plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e4

“At 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ showed also a higher capacity to modulate shoot Na + partitioning with respect to ungrafted plants by increasing Na + accumulation in older leaves (52%) and reducing Na + content in younger and most active leaves (24%), thus enabling the maintenance of higher K + /Na + , Ca 2+ /Na + , and Mg 2+ /Na + ratios compared with ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arnold grafts maintained higher K + /Na + ratios than ungrafted plants at 20 m m NaCl.

Treatment
grafted onto ‘Arnold’e4
Outcome
K + /Na +e4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
ungrafted plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e4

“At 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ showed also a higher capacity to modulate shoot Na + partitioning with respect to ungrafted plants by increasing Na + accumulation in older leaves (52%) and reducing Na + content in younger and most active leaves (24%), thus enabling the maintenance of higher K + /Na + , Ca 2+ /Na + , and Mg 2+ /Na + ratios compared with ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arnold grafts maintained higher Ca 2+ /Na + ratios than ungrafted plants at 20 m m NaCl.

Treatment
grafted onto ‘Arnold’e4
Outcome
Ca 2+ /Na +e4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
ungrafted plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e4

“At 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ showed also a higher capacity to modulate shoot Na + partitioning with respect to ungrafted plants by increasing Na + accumulation in older leaves (52%) and reducing Na + content in younger and most active leaves (24%), thus enabling the maintenance of higher K + /Na + , Ca 2+ /Na + , and Mg 2+ /Na + ratios compared with ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arnold grafts maintained higher Mg 2+ /Na + ratios than ungrafted plants at 20 m m NaCl.

Treatment
grafted onto ‘Arnold’e4
Outcome
Mg 2+ /Na +e4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
ungrafted plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e4

“At 20 m m of NaCl, plants grafted onto ‘Arnold’ showed also a higher capacity to modulate shoot Na + partitioning with respect to ungrafted plants by increasing Na + accumulation in older leaves (52%) and reducing Na + content in younger and most active leaves (24%), thus enabling the maintenance of higher K + /Na + , Ca 2+ /Na + , and Mg 2+ /Na + ratios compared with ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting did not change fruit soluble solids, titratable acidity or dry matter across salinity levels.

Treatment
graftinge5
Outcome
Fruit total soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and dry mattere5
Direction
unaffectede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit total soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and dry matter were unaffected by grafting at any SS level, whereas under SS, the fruit juice Na + content of grafted plants was consistently lower (from 19% up to 68%) than that of ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity, grafted plants had 19% to 68% lower fruit juice Na + content than ungrafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse5
Outcome
fruit juice Na + contente5
Direction
lowere5
Value
from 19% up to 68%e5
Comparator
ungrafted plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit total soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and dry matter were unaffected by grafting at any SS level, whereas under SS, the fruit juice Na + content of grafted plants was consistently lower (from 19% up to 68%) than that of ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1791 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Arnold-like rootstocks at moderate salinity to improve yield and fruit nutritional value.

Material
‘Arnold’e6
Outcome
increase tomato yield and enhance tomato nutritional valuee6
Qualifier
moderate SS conditions (20 m m of NaCl)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under moderate SS conditions (20 m m of NaCl), the use of rootstock genotypes such as ‘Arnold’ having a particular ability to reduce Na + accumulation in younger and most active leaves may increase tomato yield and enhance tomato nutritional value by reducing the fruit juice Na + content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–2081 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

48 papers: 8 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

29 papers: 11 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

53 papers: 43 positive, 10 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

grafting · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.