Paper · 1991 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Growth, Yield, and Fruit Weight of Spur-bound `Delicious' Apple Trees following Spur-pruning and BA Plus GA4+7 Application

Richard P. Marini; Donald Sowers

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Twenty-eight-year-old `Starkrimson Delicious' and 10-year-old `Fullred Delicious' apple (Malus domestics Borkh.) trees were spur-pruned in 1986 and 1987 and/or treated with 500 mg BA + GA 4+7 /liter in 1986 in an attempt to improve spur growth and increase fruit weight. All treatment combinations generally failed to improve yield or fruit size. BA + GA 4+7 reduced yield and fruit weight and increased the number of pygmy fruit in 1986, but had little effect on fruiting or vegetative growth for 3 years after treatment. Spur-pruning reduced spur density in 1986 and 1987 and increased yield, but not fruit weight, in 1987. Although spur-pruning improved spur length, spur bud diameter, leaf area per spur, and leaf dry weight per spur, fruit weight was not improved. Chemical names used: N -(phenylmethyl)-1H -purine-6-amine [benzyladenine (BA)]; gibberellin (GA 4+7 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment combinations generally failed to improve apple yield or fruit size.

Treatment
treatment combinationse0
Outcome
yield or fruit sizee0
Direction
failed to improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatment combinations generally failed to improve yield or fruit size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA plus GA reduced yield and fruit weight in 1986.

Treatment
BA + GA 4+7e0
Outcome
yield and fruit weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in 1986e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BA + GA 4+7 reduced yield and fruit weight and increased the number of pygmy fruit in 1986”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA plus GA increased the number of pygmy fruit in 1986.

Treatment
BA + GA 4+7e0
Outcome
number of pygmy fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in 1986e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BA + GA 4+7 reduced yield and fruit weight and increased the number of pygmy fruit in 1986”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA plus GA had little effect on fruiting or vegetative growth for three years.

Treatment
BA + GA 4+7e0
Outcome
fruiting or vegetative growthe0
Direction
little effecte0
Qualifier
for 3 years after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BA + GA 4+7 reduced yield and fruit weight and increased the number of pygmy fruit in 1986, but had little effect on fruiting or vegetative growth for 3 years after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spur pruning reduced spur density in 1986 and 1987.

Treatment
Spur-pruninge0
Outcome
spur densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spur-pruning reduced spur density in 1986 and 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spur pruning increased yield in 1987.

Treatment
Spur-pruninge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in 1987e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spur-pruning reduced spur density in 1986 and 1987 and increased yield, but not fruit weight, in 1987.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spur pruning did not increase fruit weight in 1987.

Treatment
Spur-pruninge0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spur-pruning reduced spur density in 1986 and 1987 and increased yield, but not fruit weight, in 1987.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spur pruning improved spur length, spur bud diameter, leaf area and dry weight per spur.

Treatment
spur-pruninge0
Outcome
spur length, spur bud diameter, leaf area per spur, and leaf dry weight per spure0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spur-pruning improved spur length, spur bud diameter, leaf area per spur, and leaf dry weight per spur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite improved spur growth, spur pruning did not improve fruit weight.

Treatment
spur-pruninge0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
not improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although spur-pruning improved spur length, spur bud diameter, leaf area per spur, and leaf dry weight per spur, fruit weight was not improved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

33 papers: 23 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

57 papers: 40 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

N-benzyladenine · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

75 papers: 57 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 16 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.