Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Influence of biochar on growth and photosynthetic attributes of Triticum aestivum L. under half and full irrigation

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Efficient use of water for the cultivation of crops is the need of time especially in those areas of world where water has becoming scared. This shortage of water supply impose drought stress that reduces the yield of many cereals like Triticum aestivum L. up to many folds especially in Pakistan where handiness of better quality irrigational water is very less. To overcome that problem addition of biochar as an amendment in our experiment was examined. Cotton sticks waste biochar was prepared by pyrolysis at 3850C whose pH and EC were 8.42 and 2.33 dS/m respectively. There were 6 treatments and 6 replications having half and full doze of irrigational water with biochar 3 implication rates (0%, 1% and 2%) in sandy soils. Results revealed significant increase in almost all the attributes of tested plants (fresh biomass, dry biomass, stem length, root length) at the amended rates of 1% and 2% biochar in sandy soils as compared to control. Chlorophyll pigments (a, b and total), carotenoids and anthocyanin (except lycopene) production was also improved due to biochar addition in the sandy soils. Biochar application enhanced water holding capacity of sandy soil which reduces the effect of drought in half irrigation treatment. Based on the results it is concluded that cotton sticks waste biochar can be effectively used (1% and 2%) to improve water holding capacity of sandy soils due to which drought stress can be reduced while crop yield is also enhanced as supplement availability of water which assist photosynthesis to produce photosynthetic and accessory pigments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 1% and 2% significantly increased wheat fresh and dry biomass and stem and root length versus control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
1% and 2% biochare0
Outcome
fresh biomass, dry biomass, stem length, root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant increase in almost all the attributes of tested plants (fresh biomass, dry biomass, stem length, root length) at the amended rates of 1% and 2% biochar in sandy soils as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar improved chlorophyll pigments, carotenoids and anthocyanin production.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
biochar additione0
Outcome
Chlorophyll pigments (a, b and total), carotenoids and anthocyanine0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chlorophyll pigments (a, b and total), carotenoids and anthocyanin (except lycopene) production was also improved due to biochar addition in the sandy soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar enhanced sandy soil water holding capacity and reduced drought effects under half irrigation.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Biochar applicatione0
Outcome
water holding capacity of sandy soile0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
half irrigation treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Biochar application enhanced water holding capacity of sandy soil which reduces the effect of drought in half irrigation treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1239 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 1% and 2% cotton sticks waste biochar to improve water holding capacity and reduce drought stress.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
cotton sticks waste biochare0
Outcome
improve water holding capacity of sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“cotton sticks waste biochar can be effectively used (1% and 2%) to improve water holding capacity of sandy soils due to which drought stress can be reduced while crop yield is also enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1471 · show in text ↑

biochar · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

biochar · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

biochar · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.