Paper · 2012 · HortScience

Defining Irrigation Set Points Based on Substrate Properties for Variable Irrigation and Constant Matric Potential Devices in Greenhouse Tomato

Isabelle Lemay; Jean Caron; Martine Dorais; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ongoing research on organic growing media for greenhouse tomato production is driven by the constant changes in the quality, stability, and form of the organic byproducts used in the manufacturing of these media. This study was undertaken to determine appropriate irrigation set points for a sawdust–peat mix (SP) under development given that the performance of this substrate appeared to be strongly dependent on appropriate irrigation management. A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer. Using preliminary measurements from an initial experiment (Expt. 1), different irrigation strategies for the SP substrate were compared in a second experiment (Expt. 2): 1) a variable irrigation regime using a timer control (with frequency adjusted as a function of irradiance); 2) tensiometer control at –1.5 kPa; and 3) two constant substrate water potential devices: –1.1 kPa and –0.9 kPa. An irrigation timer/controller using solar radiation input was used with a rockwool control (RC) substrate. Measurements of plant activity [photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance ( g S )], substrate physical and chemical properties, biomass, and yield were obtained. For all irrigation strategies, results indicated that 10% to 20% higher photosynthesis rates and g S values were obtained with the SP substrate compared with RC. Data indicated that moderate drying conditions (matric potential ranging from –2.2 kPa to –1.5 kPa in Expt. 1 and Expt. 2, respectively) relative to container capacity (–0.6 kPa) were beneficial for improving plant photosynthetic activity and allowed the highest yields for the SP substrate. Variable irrigation management showed higher levels of plant activity than constant watering and increased the oxygen concentration in the substrate by ≈2% in absolute value relative to the constant water potential device. Lower CO 2 and N 2 O levels were also observed with the variable irrigation strategy. On the other hand, maximum nutrient solution savings were achieved with the constant matric potential devices (8% to 31% relative to the RC). This study showed high productivity potential for the SP substrate with suitable irrigation management. Replacing conventional growing media with organic waste-based products using an appropriate irrigation strategy may help to increase the sustainability of the greenhouse industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SP substrate gave 10% to 20% higher photosynthesis rates and stomatal conductance than rockwool under all irrigation strategies.

Treatment
SP substratee1
Outcome
photosynthesis rates and g S valuese1
Direction
highere1
Value
10% to 20%e1
Comparator
RCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e1

“For all irrigation strategies, results indicated that 10% to 20% higher photosynthesis rates and g S values were obtained with the SP substrate compared with RC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drying conditions improved tomato photosynthetic activity relative to container capacity.

Treatment
moderate drying conditionse2
Outcome
plant photosynthetic activitye2
Direction
improvinge2
Comparator
container capacitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e2

“moderate drying conditions (matric potential ranging from –2.2 kPa to –1.5 kPa in Expt. 1 and Expt. 2, respectively) relative to container capacity (–0.6 kPa) were beneficial for improving plant photosynthetic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drying conditions gave the highest tomato yields on the SP substrate relative to container capacity.

Treatment
moderate drying conditionse2
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
container capacitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e2

“moderate drying conditions (matric potential ranging from –2.2 kPa to –1.5 kPa in Expt. 1 and Expt. 2, respectively) relative to container capacity (–0.6 kPa) were beneficial for improving plant photosynthetic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1659 · show in text ↑
e3

“allowed the highest yields for the SP substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable irrigation management showed higher plant activity than constant watering.

Treatment
Variable irrigation managemente4
Outcome
plant activitye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
constant wateringe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e4

“Variable irrigation management showed higher levels of plant activity than constant watering and increased the oxygen concentration in the substrate by ≈2% in absolute value relative to the constant water potential device”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable irrigation management increased the substrate oxygen concentration by about 2% relative to the constant water potential device.

Treatment
Variable irrigation managemente4
Outcome
oxygen concentration in the substratee4
Direction
increasede4
Value
≈2%e4
Comparator
constant water potential devicee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e4

“Variable irrigation management showed higher levels of plant activity than constant watering and increased the oxygen concentration in the substrate by ≈2% in absolute value relative to the constant water potential device”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1934 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower CO2 and N2O levels were observed with the variable irrigation strategy in tomato.

Treatment
variable irrigation strategye6
Outcome
CO 2 and N 2 O levelse6
Direction
Lowere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lower CO 2 and N 2 O levels were also observed with the variable irrigation strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Constant matric potential devices gave the maximum nutrient solution savings, 8% to 31% relative to rockwool.

Treatment
constant matric potential devicese7
Outcome
nutrient solution savingse7
Direction
maximume7
Value
8% to 31%e7
Comparator
RCe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e7

“maximum nutrient solution savings were achieved with the constant matric potential devices (8% to 31% relative to the RC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study showed high productivity potential for the SP substrate with suitable irrigation management.

Treatment
SP substratee1
Outcome
high productivity potentiale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study showed high productivity potential for the SP substrate with suitable irrigation management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2164–2266 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing conventional growing media with organic waste-based products using an appropriate irrigation strategy may increase the sustainability of the greenhouse industry.

Treatment
Replacing conventional growing media with organic waste-based productse1
Outcome
sustainability of the greenhouse industrye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted to compare different irrigation management approaches for a SP substrate in the spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–591 · show in text ↑
e1

“Replacing conventional growing media with organic waste-based products using an appropriate irrigation strategy may help to increase the sustainability of the greenhouse industry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2268–2446 · show in text ↑

processing · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

growing medium · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

processing · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 33 positive, 18 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.