Paper · 2014

Research on Camelina sativa wintering, by genotype and fertilizer doses used, in the pedo-climatical conditions from the south of Romania

P. Dobre; Nicoleta-Alina Udroiu; Mihai Gîdea; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The research, carried out under the project Sustainable Initiative Towards Aviation Kerosene ITAKA, aimed testing resistance the wintering varieties of Camelina sativa (Camelia - Romania, Calenda - Austria, GP 202 - Germany and GP 204 - Germany), under the conditions of soil and climate in southern Romania. Sowing was done in middle October 2013 using a seed rate of 8 kg/ha. Several trials with different fertilization schemes (based on nitrogen and phosphorus) were implemented. Determination of plant population was firstly done in autumn (before frost period) and then in early spring. For all cultivars tested, the minimal losses were recorded for trials fertilized with medium concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus (N80 P 60) and the highest losses were recorded for the control trials (without fertilization).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization with medium nitrogen and phosphorus (N80 P 60) gave minimal plant population losses for all Camelina sativa cultivars.

Taxon
Camelina sativaCamelina sativae0
Material
wintering varietiese0
Treatment
medium concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus (N80 P 60)e1
Outcome
lossese1
Direction
minimale1
Comparator
control trials (without fertilization)e1
Setting
southern Romaniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aimed testing resistance the wintering varieties of Camelina sativa (Camelia - Romania, Calenda - Austria, GP 202 - Germany and GP 204 - Germany), under the conditions of soil and climate in southern Romania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–307 · show in text ↑
e1

“For all cultivars tested, the minimal losses were recorded for trials fertilized with medium concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus (N80 P 60) and the highest losses were recorded for the control trials (without fertilization)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilized control trials had the highest plant population losses in Camelina sativa.

Taxon
Camelina sativaCamelina sativae0
Treatment
without fertilizatione1
Outcome
lossese1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
medium concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus (N80 P 60)e1
Setting
southern Romaniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aimed testing resistance the wintering varieties of Camelina sativa (Camelia - Romania, Calenda - Austria, GP 202 - Germany and GP 204 - Germany), under the conditions of soil and climate in southern Romania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–307 · show in text ↑
e1

“For all cultivars tested, the minimal losses were recorded for trials fertilized with medium concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus (N80 P 60) and the highest losses were recorded for the control trials (without fertilization)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–821 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Camelina sativa (false flax)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Camelina sativa (false flax)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Camelina sativa (false flax)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.