Paper · 2012

In VItro Preservation of autochthonous Plum GenotyPes

T. Vujović; Robert Cerović

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

RUZIC, Dj., T. VUJOVIC and R. CEROVIC , 2012. In vitro preservation of autochthonous plum genotypes. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 18: 55-62 The paper presents results of the application of ‘Cold storage’ (CS), an in vitro technique for preservation of cultures at +5 o C in total darkness. This simple in vitro preservation method is effectively employed in large plant gene bank repositories for the purpose of preservation of valuable plant germplasm. In order to protect from extinction autochthonous plums Crvena Ranka (Prunus insititia L.), Sitnica (Prunus domestica L.) and Cherry plum (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) a protocol for their in vitro preservation has been developed. Upon the establishment of aseptic culture, the studied genotypes were propagated in vitro on Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium of different hormonal composition, depending on genotype. During CS, in vitro shoots were maintained at +5 o C in cold chamber for 3, 6 and 9 months in total darkness. Seven days after respective period, viability of shoots for further propagation was determined as well as multiplication parameters and length of axial and lateral shoots. Three months after maintaining shoots in CS, shoots of Crvena Ranka and Sitnica showed high shoot viability (in excess of 50%), while in Cherry plum viable shoots were etiolated showing symptoms of leaf necrosis (in more than 20%). However, after 6-month preservation under cold conditions, only shoots of Crvena Ranka survived showing necrosis on shoot tips, but they had viable, chlorotic lateral shoots (in excess of 45% of shoots). All three genotypes showed severe signs of necrosis after 9 months of cold storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crvena Ranka shoots had over 50% viability after three months cold storage.

Taxon
Prunus insititia L.e1
Material
Crvena Rankae0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Three months after maintaining shoots in CSe0
Outcome
shoot viabilitye0
Direction
highe0
Value
in excess of 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Three months after maintaining shoots in CS, shoots of Crvena Ranka and Sitnica showed high shoot viability (in excess of 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crvena Ranka (Prunus insititia L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sitnica shoots had over 50% viability after three months cold storage.

Taxon
Prunus domestica L.Prunus domesticae1
Material
Sitnicae0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Three months after maintaining shoots in CSe0
Outcome
shoot viabilitye0
Direction
highe0
Value
in excess of 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three months after maintaining shoots in CS, shoots of Crvena Ranka and Sitnica showed high shoot viability (in excess of 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sitnica (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–568 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cherry plum shoots showed etiolation and leaf necrosis above 20% after three months.

Taxon
Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.Prunus cerasiferae1
Material
Cherry plume0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
symptoms of leaf necrosise0
Value
in more than 20%e0
Qualifier
Three months after maintaining shoots in CSe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Cherry plum viable shoots were etiolated showing symptoms of leaf necrosis (in more than 20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1371 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cherry plum (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–610 · show in text ↑
e2

“Three months after maintaining shoots in CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After six months only Crvena Ranka shoots survived, with necrotic tips and viable chlorotic lateral shoots above 45%.

Taxon
Prunus insititia L.e1
Material
Crvena Rankae0
Outcome
viable, chlorotic lateral shootse0
Value
in excess of 45% of shootse0
Qualifier
after 6-month preservation under cold conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“after 6-month preservation under cold conditions, only shoots of Crvena Ranka survived showing necrosis on shoot tips, but they had viable, chlorotic lateral shoots (in excess of 45% of shoots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1575 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crvena Ranka (Prunus insititia L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three genotypes had severe necrosis after nine months cold storage.

Taxon
autochthonous plumse1
Outcome
severe signs of necrosise0
Qualifier
after 9 months of cold storagee0

Verbatim

e0

“All three genotypes showed severe signs of necrosis after 9 months of cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1659 · show in text ↑
e1

“autochthonous plums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–502 · show in text ↑

cold · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.