Paper · 2014 · PubMed

Control of wilt disease of lentil through bio control agents and organic amendments in Tarai region of Uttarakhand, India.

Ankita Garkoti; Vijay Kumar; H S Tripathi

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present work aimed at evaluating the efficacy of bioagents and organic amendments against lentil wilt pathogen. Field trials were carried out consecutively during Rabi 2010-11 and 2011-12 crop seasons in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications, using 'Pant L-639' a popular cultivar. The plot size was 3.0 x 1.5 m2 with row spacing of 30 cm. Effect of selected bioagents and organic amendments on disease incidence, 1000 grain weight and yield kg ha' of lentil was recorded. It was observed that seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescens significant by reduced 1.73% (2010-11) and 1.93% (2011-12) in Fusarium wilt disease incidence and increase in grain yield 507.6 kg ha(-1) and 496.0 kg ha(-1) respectively during both crop seasons. Among organic amendments, minimum wilt disease incidence of 1.69% (2010-11) and 1.81% (2011-12) and maximum grain yield 496.3 kg ha(-1) (2010-11) and 484.0 kg ha(-1) (2011-12) were observed in farm yard manure + spent compost treated plots. This indicates that these treatments have important roles in biologically based management strategies for controling Fusarium wilt disease under organic mode of lentil cultivation in Uttarakhand State.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The seed treatment reduced Fusarium wilt incidence to 1.73% in 2010-11.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harizanume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Fusarium wilt disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.73%e0
Qualifier
2010-11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescens significant by reduced 1.73% (2010-11) and 1.93% (2011-12) in Fusarium wilt disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The seed treatment reduced Fusarium wilt incidence to 1.93% in 2011-12.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Fusarium wilt disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.93%e0
Qualifier
2011-12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescens significant by reduced 1.73% (2010-11) and 1.93% (2011-12) in Fusarium wilt disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The seed treatment produced grain yield of 507.6 kg ha(-1) in 2010-11.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Trichoderma harizanume0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
507.6 kg ha(-1)e0
Qualifier
2010-11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescens significant by reduced 1.73% (2010-11) and 1.93% (2011-12) in Fusarium wilt disease incidence and increase in grain yield 507.6 kg ha(-1) and 496.0 kg ha(-1) respectively during both crop seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The seed treatment produced grain yield of 496.0 kg ha(-1) in 2011-12.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Trichoderma harizanume0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
496.0 kg ha(-1)e0
Qualifier
2011-12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Trichoderma harizanum + Pseudomonas fluorescens significant by reduced 1.73% (2010-11) and 1.93% (2011-12) in Fusarium wilt disease incidence and increase in grain yield 507.6 kg ha(-1) and 496.0 kg ha(-1) respectively during both crop seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plus spent compost gave minimum wilt incidence of 1.69% in 2010-11.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
farm yard manure + spent composte0
Outcome
wilt disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.69%e0
Qualifier
2010-11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum wilt disease incidence of 1.69% (2010-11) and 1.81% (2011-12) and maximum grain yield 496.3 kg ha(-1) (2010-11) and 484.0 kg ha(-1) (2011-12) were observed in farm yard manure + spent compost treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plus spent compost gave minimum wilt incidence of 1.81% in 2011-12.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
farm yard manure + spent composte0
Outcome
wilt disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.81%e0
Qualifier
2011-12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum wilt disease incidence of 1.69% (2010-11) and 1.81% (2011-12) and maximum grain yield 496.3 kg ha(-1) (2010-11) and 484.0 kg ha(-1) (2011-12) were observed in farm yard manure + spent compost treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plus spent compost gave maximum grain yield of 496.3 kg ha(-1) in 2010-11.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
farm yard manure + spent composte0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
496.3 kg ha(-1)e0
Qualifier
2010-11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum wilt disease incidence of 1.69% (2010-11) and 1.81% (2011-12) and maximum grain yield 496.3 kg ha(-1) (2010-11) and 484.0 kg ha(-1) (2011-12) were observed in farm yard manure + spent compost treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plus spent compost gave maximum grain yield of 484.0 kg ha(-1) in 2011-12.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
farm yard manure + spent composte0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
484.0 kg ha(-1)e0
Qualifier
2011-12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum wilt disease incidence of 1.69% (2010-11) and 1.81% (2011-12) and maximum grain yield 496.3 kg ha(-1) (2010-11) and 484.0 kg ha(-1) (2011-12) were observed in farm yard manure + spent compost treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors viewed these treatments as useful for biological control of lentil Fusarium wilt in organic cultivation.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
biologically based management strategies for controling Fusarium wilt diseasee0
Setting
Uttarakhand Statee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these treatments have important roles in biologically based management strategies for controling Fusarium wilt disease under organic mode of lentil cultivation in Uttarakhand State”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1220 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Fusarium · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

seed treatment · Fusarium · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.