Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment gave 34.21% lentil wilt incidence at 90 days after sowing in 2016-17, below the 53.60% control.

A claim from Effect of seed treatment with fungicides, nutrients and bio-agents on wilt of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment gave 34.21% lentil wilt incidence at 90 days after sowing in 2016-17, below the 53.60% control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescense1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume2pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
followed bye1
Value
34.21%e1
Qualifier
control (53.60%)e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
the year 2016-17e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wilt of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–109
e1

“Minimum disease incidence (32.33%) was recorded in Carbendazim @ 0.2 g/kg seed followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens (34.21%), Bacillus subtilis (36.45%), Trichoderma viride (41.40%), Trichoderma harzianum (44%), Trichoderma virens (45.44%) Zn (48.80%) and Mn (50.10) as compared to control (53.60%) at 90 days after sowing in the year 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–548
e2

“mainly due to the Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–81

Title

Effect of seed treatment with fungicides, nutrients and bio-agents on wilt of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus)

Khushboo Dubey Journal of Current Opinion in Crop Science 2021. doi:10.62773/jcocs.v2i1.44

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-024bba3430892daf7263798c8237a7b460beb0cb1b672741abde7dc4371908f0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Fusarium · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.