Paper · 2012

WEED SCIENCE Glufosinate-Resistant Cotton Tolerance to Combinations of Glufosinate with Insecticides and Mepiquat Chloride

Donnie K. Miller; Daniel O. Stephenson; David C. Blouin

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field trials were conducted during 2008 and 2009 to evaluate glufosinate-resistant (GLFR) cotton response to glufosinate alone or mixed with the plant growth regulator mepiquat chloride with or without 10 insecticides applied to cotton at pinhead square or first bloom. Less than 2% visual injury was observed with any treatment. At both 14 and 28 d after treatment (DAT), mepiquat chloride mixed with glufosinate reduced cotton height 7 to 8 cm and 2 cm when applied at pinhead square and first flower growth stages, respectively, compared to glufosinate applied alone. Insecticides added to glufosinate alone, or glufosinate plus mepiquat chloride had no impact on plant height. Differences in seed cotton yield were not observed, indicating that minimal cotton injury and early season height differences did not influence cotton yield. Glufosinate combined with insecticides and mepiquat chloride, in accordance with herbicide labeling for glufosinate-resistant cotton, offers producers the ability to integrate pest and crop management strategies with crop safety while reducing production costs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments caused less than 2% visible injury.

Treatment
any treatmente0
Outcome
visual injurye0
Value
Less than 2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Less than 2% visual injury was observed with any treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–329 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride with glufosinate reduced height 7 to 8 cm at pinhead square versus glufosinate alone.

Organ / stage
pinhead squaree0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride mixed with glufosinatee0
Outcome
cotton heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7 to 8 cme0
Qualifier
At both 14 and 28 d after treatment (DAT)e0
Comparator
glufosinate applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At both 14 and 28 d after treatment (DAT), mepiquat chloride mixed with glufosinate reduced cotton height 7 to 8 cm and 2 cm when applied at pinhead square and first flower growth stages, respectively, compared to glufosinate applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride with glufosinate reduced height 2 cm at first flower versus glufosinate alone.

Organ / stage
first flower growth stagese0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride mixed with glufosinatee0
Outcome
cotton heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2 cme0
Qualifier
At both 14 and 28 d after treatment (DAT)e0
Comparator
glufosinate applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At both 14 and 28 d after treatment (DAT), mepiquat chloride mixed with glufosinate reduced cotton height 7 to 8 cm and 2 cm when applied at pinhead square and first flower growth stages, respectively, compared to glufosinate applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding insecticides to glufosinate alone did not change plant height.

Treatment
Insecticides added to glufosinate alonee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no impacte0
Comparator
glufosinate alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticides added to glufosinate alone, or glufosinate plus mepiquat chloride had no impact on plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding insecticides to glufosinate and mepiquat did not change plant height.

Treatment
Insecticides added to glufosinate alone, or glufosinate plus mepiquat chloridee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no impacte0
Comparator
glufosinate plus mepiquat chloridee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticides added to glufosinate alone, or glufosinate plus mepiquat chloride had no impact on plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield did not differ among treatments.

Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
Differences in seed cotton yield were not observede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in seed cotton yield were not observed, indicating that minimal cotton injury and early season height differences did not influence cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–838 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that labeled mixtures can integrate management safely and reduce costs.

Treatment
Glufosinate combined with insecticides and mepiquat chloridee0
Outcome
integrate pest and crop management strategies with crop safety while reducing production costse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate combined with insecticides and mepiquat chloride, in accordance with herbicide labeling for glufosinate-resistant cotton, offers producers the ability to integrate pest and crop management strategies with crop safety while reducing production costs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1100 · show in text ↑

glufosinate · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

insecticide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

18 papers: 7 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.