glufosinate · Growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
12 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- WEED SCIENCE Evaluation of GlyTol ™ and GlyTol ™ + LibertyLink ® Cotton in the Mid-South (2013)
decreaseTwo or three glufosinate applications reduced glyphosate/glufosinate-resistant cotton height by up to 4 cm.
Glufosinate tolerance of widestrike and liberty-link cotton varieties and the recoverability of upland cotton following terminal removal (2013)no changeGlufosinate application had no effect on total node accumulation or final plant height.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 2
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 6
Response of non–glufosinate-resistant cotton to reduced rates of glufosinate · 2003
- negative
WEED SCIENCE Evaluation of GlyTol ™ and GlyTol ™ + LibertyLink ® Cotton in the Mid-South · 2013
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Response of LibertyLink and WideStrike Cotton to Varying Rates of Glufosinate · 2015
- negative
- no effect
Glufosinate plus Dicamba for Rescue Palmer Amaranth Control in XtendFlexTMCotton · 2017
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.