Paper · 2014

Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani causing stem canker disease of potato using rhizosphere mold fungi

Adel K. Madbouly; Angela Boari; Maurizio Vurro; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to obtain effective rhizosphere fungal bio-control agents (bio-fungicides) that can antagonize Rhizoctonia solani; the fungal causal agent of stem canker disease of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and to improve the growth of the potato plant. A total of eleven different isolates of mold fungi were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of potato plants collected from three different potato cultivation areas in El-Monofia governorate-Egypt. Three isolates belong to the genus of Fusarium and three to Aspergillus, whereas the other five isolates belong to the genera of Penicillium, Absidia, Mucor, Gliocladium and Alternaria. In dual culture technique on Sabouraud dextrose agar media, three species (Gliocladium virens; Penicillium oxalicum and Trichoderma viride), completely surrounded the pathogen colonies and prevented their radial spread. In vivo results of antagonism in greenhouse were very promising as growth of potato plant was highly promoted by the three bio-agents compared with positive and non-infested control plants. Studies on soil population dynamics of selected Gliocladium virens showed a gradual decrease in CFU with increasing periods of incubation. Maize kernels and wheat bran were the best solid substrates for the mass production of Gliocladium virens conidia especially at 30% initial moisture level. The highest percentage of viable conidia of formulated Gliocladium virens was obtained on storage at 4˚C. Gliocladium virens showed promising results of antagonizing R. solani in vitro and improving potato growth under greenhouse conditions, subsequently, could be mass produced and formulated to be used as an effective biofungicide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliocladium virens surrounded pathogen colonies and prevented radial spread in dual culture.

Treatment
Gliocladium virense0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
Gliocladium virensTrichoderma virense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
prevented their radial spreade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In dual culture technique on Sabouraud dextrose agar media, three species (Gliocladium virens; Penicillium oxalicum and Trichoderma viride), completely surrounded the pathogen colonies and prevented their radial spread.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani; the fungal causal agent of stem canker disease of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium oxalicum surrounded pathogen colonies and prevented radial spread in dual culture.

Treatment
Penicillium oxalicume0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
Penicillium oxalicumPenicillium oxalicume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
prevented their radial spreade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Penicillium oxalicum
Penicillium oxalicum · Second interactorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In dual culture technique on Sabouraud dextrose agar media, three species (Gliocladium virens; Penicillium oxalicum and Trichoderma viride), completely surrounded the pathogen colonies and prevented their radial spread.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani; the fungal causal agent of stem canker disease of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride surrounded pathogen colonies and prevented radial spread in dual culture.

Treatment
Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
prevented their radial spreade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In dual culture technique on Sabouraud dextrose agar media, three species (Gliocladium virens; Penicillium oxalicum and Trichoderma viride), completely surrounded the pathogen colonies and prevented their radial spread.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani; the fungal causal agent of stem canker disease of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliocladium virens strongly promoted potato growth relative to controls in the greenhouse.

Treatment
Gliocladium virense1
Interactor
Gliocladium virensTrichoderma virense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of potato plante0
Direction
highly promotede0
Comparator
positive and non-infested control plantse0
Setting
greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of potato plant was highly promoted by the three bio-agents compared with positive and non-infested control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gliocladium virens; Penicillium oxalicum and Trichoderma viride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–794 · show in text ↑
e2

“under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium oxalicum strongly promoted potato growth relative to controls in the greenhouse.

Treatment
Penicillium oxalicume1
Interactor
Penicillium oxalicumPenicillium oxalicume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of potato plante0
Direction
highly promotede0
Comparator
positive and non-infested control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium oxalicum
Penicillium oxalicum · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of potato plant was highly promoted by the three bio-agents compared with positive and non-infested control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gliocladium virens; Penicillium oxalicum and Trichoderma viride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride strongly promoted potato growth relative to controls in the greenhouse.

Treatment
Trichoderma viridee1
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of potato plante0
Direction
highly promotede0
Comparator
positive and non-infested control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of potato plant was highly promoted by the three bio-agents compared with positive and non-infested control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gliocladium virens; Penicillium oxalicum and Trichoderma viride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–794 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliocladium virens CFU declined gradually as incubation time increased.

Treatment
increasing periods of incubatione0
Interactor
Gliocladium virensTrichoderma virense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Gliocladium virens showed a gradual decrease in CFUe0
Direction
gradual decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil population dynamics of selected Gliocladium virens showed a gradual decrease in CFU with increasing periods of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1203 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize kernels were a best solid substrate for producing Gliocladium virens conidia, especially at 30% initial moisture.

Material
Maize kernelse0
Interactor
Gliocladium virensTrichoderma virense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mass production of Gliocladium virens conidiae0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
30% initial moisture levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize kernels and wheat bran were the best solid substrates for the mass production of Gliocladium virens conidia especially at 30% initial moisture level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat bran was a best solid substrate for producing Gliocladium virens conidia, especially at 30% initial moisture.

Material
wheat brane0
Interactor
Gliocladium virensTrichoderma virense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mass production of Gliocladium virens conidiae0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
30% initial moisture levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize kernels and wheat bran were the best solid substrates for the mass production of Gliocladium virens conidia especially at 30% initial moisture level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 4˚C yielded the highest viable conidia percentage for formulated Gliocladium virens.

Treatment
storage at 4˚Ce0
Interactor
Gliocladium virensTrichoderma virense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
percentage of viable conidia of formulated Gliocladium virense0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of viable conidia of formulated Gliocladium virens was obtained on storage at 4˚C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1466 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–380 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest mass producing and formulating Gliocladium virens as a biofungicide.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Gliocladium virensTrichoderma virense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mass produced and formulated to be used as an effective biofungicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliocladium virens showed promising results of antagonizing R. solani in vitro and improving potato growth under greenhouse conditions, subsequently, could be mass produced and formulated to be used as an effective biofungicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1695 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.