Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the interaction between salinity and plant growth regulators (Kinetin and gibberellin) on the salt tolerance of two bread wheat cultivars (Dijilla) and (Tamooze-2) under salinity conditions. The present study was conducted to assess the effects of Kinetin and gibberellin on plant dry matters (shoots and roots), chlorophyll content and stability in upper leaves, salt tolerance index, and organic contents in plant leaves of the two cultivars grown in salinized soils at two levels (0 and 16 ds/m). Seeds of both cultivars were sown in plastic pots which filled with the salinized soil in glass house during 2014-2015 sessions. Selected cultivar gave the highest dry matters, chlorophyll content and stability, and salt tolerance index under salinity condition as compared with local cultivar. Also the selected cultivar had the highest organic compounds in their leaves, especially under salinity condition. Both plant growth regulators were effective in increasing all the measured characters of both cultivars under non-saline condition but at salinity condition were effective in selected cultivar only. The Kinetin was more effective than the gibberellin in their effect on the salt tolerance of the plants under saline condition. Generally under these conditions the selected cultivar (Dijilla) was more salt tolerance than local cultivar.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity, the selected cultivar gave the highest dry matters, chlorophyll content and stability compared with the local cultivar.
- Taxon
- Bread Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Selected cultivare1
- Treatment
- salinity conditione1
- Outcome
- dry matters, chlorophyll content and stabilitye1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- local cultivare1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Bread Wheat”
e1“Selected cultivar gave the highest dry matters, chlorophyll content and stability, and salt tolerance index under salinity condition as compared with local cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity, the selected cultivar gave the highest salt tolerance index compared with the local cultivar.
- Taxon
- Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Selected cultivare1
- Treatment
- salinity conditione1
- Outcome
- salt tolerance indexe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- local cultivare1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Bread Wheat”
e1“Selected cultivar gave the highest dry matters, chlorophyll content and stability, and salt tolerance index under salinity condition as compared with local cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
The selected cultivar had the highest organic compounds in its leaves, especially under salinity.
- Taxon
- Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- selected cultivare1
- Organ / stage
- leavese1
- Treatment
- salinity conditione1
- Outcome
- organic compoundse1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Bread Wheat”
e1“the selected cultivar had the highest organic compounds in their leaves, especially under salinity condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Both plant growth regulators were effective in increasing all the measured characters of both cultivars under non-saline condition.
- Taxon
- Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- plant growth regulatorse1
- Outcome
- all the measured characterse1
- Direction
- increasinge1
- Qualifier
- non-saline conditione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Bread Wheat”
e1“Both plant growth regulators were effective in increasing all the measured characters of both cultivars under non-saline condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity, the plant growth regulators were effective in the selected cultivar only.
- Taxon
- Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- selected cultivare1
- Treatment
- plant growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Qualifier
- at salinity conditione1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Bread Wheat”
e0“Both plant growth regulators”
e1“at salinity condition were effective in selected cultivar only”
Claim · model-written summary
Under saline condition, Kinetin was more effective than gibberellin on the salt tolerance of the plants.
- Taxon
- Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Kinetine1
- Outcome
- salt tolerance of the plantse1
- Direction
- more effectivee1
- Qualifier
- saline conditione1
- Comparator
- gibberelline1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Bread Wheat”
e1“The Kinetin was more effective than the gibberellin in their effect on the salt tolerance of the plants under saline condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Under these conditions the selected cultivar Dijilla was more salt tolerant than the local cultivar.
- Taxon
- Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Dijillae1
- Outcome
- salt tolerancee1
- Direction
- more salt tolerancee1
- Comparator
- local cultivare1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Bread Wheat”
e1“the selected cultivar (Dijilla) was more salt tolerance than local cultivar”
The same questions in other papers
kinetin · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
83 papers more in this group
See all 87 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.