Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Evaluating and Screening of Agro-Physiological Indices for Salinity Stress Tolerance in Wheat at the Seedling Stage

Rongrong Tao; Jinfeng Ding; Chunyan Li; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
123
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil salinity is a worldwide issue that affects wheat production. A comprehensive understanding of salt-tolerance mechanisms and the selection of reliable screening indices are crucial for breeding salt-tolerant wheat cultivars. In this study, 30 wheat genotypes (obtained from a rapid selection of 96 original varieties) were chosen to investigate the existing screening methods and clarify the salinity tolerance mechanisms in wheat. Ten-day-old seedlings were treated with 150 mM NaCl. Eighteen agronomic and physiological parameters were measured. The results indicated that the effects of salinity on the agronomic and physiological traits were significant. Salinity stress significantly decreased K + content and K + /Na + ratio in the whole plant, while the leaf K + /Na + ratio was the strongest determinant of salinity tolerance and had a significantly positive correlation with salt tolerance. In contrast, salinity stress significantly increased Na + concentration and relative gene expression ( TaHKT1;5 , TaSOS1 , and TaAKT1-like ). The Na + transporter gene ( TaHKT1;5 ) showed a significantly greater increase in expression than the K + transporter gene ( TaAKT1-like ). We concluded that Na + exclusion rather than K + retention contributed to an optimal leaf K + /Na + ratio. Furthermore, the present exploration revealed that, under salt stress, tolerant accessions had higher shoot water content, shoot dry weight and lower stomatal density, leaf sap osmolality, and a significantly negative correlation was observed between salt tolerance and stomatal density. This indicated that changes in stomata density may represent a fundamental mechanism by which a plant may optimize water productivity and maintain growth under saline conditions. Taken together, the leaf K + /Na + ratio and stomatal density can be used as reliable screening indices for salt tolerance in wheat at the seedling stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly affected agronomic and physiological traits.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
agronomic and physiological traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of salinity on the agronomic and physiological traits were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased whole-plant K + content and K + /Na + ratio.

Organ / stage
whole plante0
Treatment
Salinity stresse0
Outcome
K + content and K + /Na + ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress significantly decreased K + content and K + /Na + ratio in the whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K + /Na + ratio was the strongest determinant of salt tolerance.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
salinity tolerancee0
Qualifier
strongest determinante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf K + /Na + ratio was the strongest determinant of salinity tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K + /Na + ratio correlated positively with salt tolerance.

Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had a significantly positive correlation with salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased Na + concentration.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
Na + concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity stress significantly increased Na + concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased expression of TaHKT1;5, TaSOS1, and TaAKT1-like.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Gene
TaHKT1;5 , TaSOS1 , and TaAKT1-likee0
Outcome
relative gene expressione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity stress significantly increased Na + concentration and relative gene expression ( TaHKT1;5 , TaSOS1 , and TaAKT1-like )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TaHKT1;5 expression increased more than TaAKT1-like expression.

Gene
TaHKT1;5e0
Outcome
increase in expressione0
Direction
greater increasee0
Comparator
TaAKT1-likee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Na + transporter gene ( TaHKT1;5 ) showed a significantly greater increase in expression than the K + transporter gene ( TaAKT1-like )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded Na + exclusion contributed to optimal leaf K + /Na + ratio more than K + retention.

Outcome
optimal leaf K + /Na + ratioe0
Qualifier
Na + exclusion rather than K + retentione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Na + exclusion rather than K + retention contributed to an optimal leaf K + /Na + ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant accessions had higher shoot water content and shoot dry weight under salt stress.

Material
tolerant accessionse0
Outcome
shoot water content, shoot dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under salt stress, tolerant accessions had higher shoot water content, shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant accessions had lower stomatal density and leaf sap osmolality under salt stress.

Outcome
stomatal density, leaf sap osmolalitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower stomatal density, leaf sap osmolality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt tolerance correlated negatively with stomatal density.

Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
stomatal densitye0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significantly negative correlation was observed between salt tolerance and stomatal density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed stomatal density changes as a mechanism for water productivity and growth under salinity.

Outcome
optimize water productivity and maintain growthe0
Qualifier
changes in stomata densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in stomata density may represent a fundamental mechanism by which a plant may optimize water productivity and maintain growth under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K + /Na + ratio and stomatal density were proposed as seedling salt tolerance screening indices.

Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Outcome
reliable screening indices for salt tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf K + /Na + ratio and stomatal density can be used as reliable screening indices for salt tolerance in wheat at the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1913 · show in text ↑

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 19 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.