Paper · 2010 · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research)

Response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp] to residual effect of different application rates of sheep manure on chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum)

B. A. Babaji; Rilwanu A. Yahaya; Musa A. Mahadi; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2005 and 2006 rainy season at the Institute for Agricultural Research farm, Samaru, Nigeria, to test the response of four cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp] varieties to residual effect of four rates of sheep manure (FYM) (0, 5, 10 and 15 t/ha) applied the previous season to chilli pepper [Capsicum annuum]. Each of the experiment was a follow up to a previous one conducted in 2004 and 2005 to test the response of pepper to those rates of FYM. Applications of different rate of FYM had significant residual effect on soil chemical content. The combined results showed significant difference among the cowpea varieties for grain yield and yield components. Mean cowpea grain yield ranged from 1.7 t/ha in IT96D-757 to 2.7 t/ha in IT97K-499-35. Previous FYM application rate significantly affected cowpea grain yield, pod weight, number of seeds per pod, seed weight per pod and threshing percentage. However, 100-seed weight was not significantly affected. Cowpea grain yield ranged from 1.4 t/ha in plots without FYM to 2.4 t/ha in plots that had 10 or 15 t/ha previous year. Significant interaction was not observed between cowpea variety and previous manure application rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different rates of FYM had a significant residual effect on soil chemical content in the cowpea trial.

Treatment
different rate of FYMe1
Outcome
soil chemical contente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to test the response of four cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp] varieties to residual effect of four rates of sheep manure (FYM) (0, 5, 10 and 15 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–281 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applications of different rate of FYM had significant residual effect on soil chemical content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–578 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea varieties differed significantly in grain yield and yield components.

Material
cowpea varietiese2
Outcome
grain yield and yield componentse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The combined results showed significant difference among the cowpea varieties for grain yield and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea variety IT96D-757 gave a mean grain yield of 1.7 t/ha.

Material
IT96D-757e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Value
1.7 t/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Mean cowpea grain yield ranged from 1.7 t/ha in IT96D-757 to 2.7 t/ha in IT97K-499-35”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea variety IT97K-499-35 gave a mean grain yield of 2.7 t/ha.

Material
IT97K-499-35e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Value
2.7 t/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Mean cowpea grain yield ranged from 1.7 t/ha in IT96D-757 to 2.7 t/ha in IT97K-499-35”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous FYM application rate significantly affected cowpea grain yield, pod weight and number of seeds per pod.

Treatment
Previous FYM application ratee4
Outcome
grain yield, pod weight, number of seeds per pode4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Previous FYM application rate significantly affected cowpea grain yield, pod weight, number of seeds per pod, seed weight per pod and threshing percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous FYM application rate significantly affected seed weight per pod and threshing percentage of cowpea.

Treatment
Previous FYM application ratee4
Outcome
seed weight per pod and threshing percentagee4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Previous FYM application rate significantly affected cowpea grain yield, pod weight, number of seeds per pod, seed weight per pod and threshing percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous FYM application rate did not significantly affect 100-seed weight of cowpea.

Treatment
Previous FYM application ratee4
Outcome
100-seed weighte5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Previous FYM application rate significantly affected cowpea grain yield, pod weight, number of seeds per pod, seed weight per pod and threshing percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–937 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, 100-seed weight was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–994 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea grain yield without FYM was 1.4 t/ha.

Outcome
grain yielde6
Value
1.4 t/hae6
Qualifier
plots without FYMe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Cowpea grain yield ranged from 1.4 t/ha in plots without FYM to 2.4 t/ha in plots that had 10 or 15 t/ha previous year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea grain yield in plots with 10 or 15 t/ha previous-year FYM was 2.4 t/ha.

Outcome
grain yielde6
Value
2.4 t/hae6
Qualifier
plots that had 10 or 15 t/ha previous yeare6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Cowpea grain yield ranged from 1.4 t/ha in plots without FYM to 2.4 t/ha in plots that had 10 or 15 t/ha previous year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant interaction was found between cowpea variety and previous manure application rate.

Treatment
previous manure application ratee7
Outcome
interactione7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Significant interaction was not observed between cowpea variety and previous manure application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1216 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 275 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.