Paper · 2015 · The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

ROW SPACING AND IRRIGATION EFFECT ON RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY OF WINTER WHEAT

Weihua ZHONG; J. Q. Liu; Xun Bo Zhou; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Winter wheat is an important food crop in northern China. To achieving higher yields with less water has been th e focus of researchers. Four planting patterns (row spacing (RS) × plant spacing), namely, 7 × 7 cm (RS7), 14 × 3.5 cm (RS14), 24.5 × 2 cm (RS24.5), and 49 × 1 cm (RS49), and four irrigation regimes, namely, 0, 60, 120, and 180 mm, were studied under field conditions during 2006-07 and 2007-08 at the Agronomy Experimental Station (36°09'N, 117°09'E) of Shandong Agricultural University in Taian, Shandong Province, China. This experiment aimed to study the effect of row spacing and irrigation on leaf area index (LAI), dry matter weight (DM), p hotosynthetically active radiation (PAR) capture ratio at different levels above the ground surface, grain yield and radiation use efficiency (RUE) of winter wheat. Results revealed higher average LAI and DM of RS14 than those of other treatments with all irrigation conditions. The canopy light interception of RS49 was significantly lower than those of other patterns. The PAR capture ratio of RS14 at 0-40 cm aboveground was lower than that at 40-80 cm aboveground, similar to those of RS7 and RS24.5 but not to that of RS49. Increased irrigation resulted in declines of PAR capture ratio at 0 -40 cm aboveground but increased at 60- 80 cm aboveground. Increasing amounts of irrigation resulted in increased yields of winter wheat, and the order RS14 ≈ RS7 > RS24.5 > RS49 was observed. Grain yields of RS7 and RS14 were significantly higher than those of RS24.5 and RS49 (P < 0.01). RS14 with irrigation at 120 mm may be the best option to increase yields and save water in northern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RS14 gave higher average LAI and dry matter than other spacing treatments at all irrigation levels.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RS14e0
Outcome
LAI and DMe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
all irrigation conditionse0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed higher average LAI and DM of RS14 than those of other treatments with all irrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RS49 had significantly lower canopy light interception than other patterns.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RS49e0
Outcome
canopy light interceptione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The canopy light interception of RS49 was significantly lower than those of other patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RS14 had lower PAR capture at 0-40 cm than at 40-80 cm.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RS14e0
Outcome
PAR capture ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
0-40 cm abovegrounde0
Comparator
40-80 cm abovegrounde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PAR capture ratio of RS14 at 0-40 cm aboveground was lower than that at 40-80 cm aboveground”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation decreased PAR capture at 0-40 cm.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increased irrigatione0
Outcome
PAR capture ratioe0
Direction
declinese0
Qualifier
0 -40 cm abovegrounde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased irrigation resulted in declines of PAR capture ratio at 0 -40 cm aboveground”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation increased PAR capture at 60-80 cm.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increased irrigatione0
Outcome
PAR capture ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
60- 80 cm abovegrounde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased irrigation resulted in declines of PAR capture ratio at 0 -40 cm aboveground but increased at 60- 80 cm aboveground”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More irrigation increased winter wheat yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Increasing amounts of irrigatione0
Outcome
yields of winter wheate0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing amounts of irrigation resulted in increased yields of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1394 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield followed RS14 ≈ RS7 > RS24.5 > RS49.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
order RS14 ≈ RS7 > RS24.5 > RS49e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the order RS14 ≈ RS7 > RS24.5 > RS49 was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RS7 and RS14 yielded significantly more grain than RS24.5 and RS49.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RS7 and RS14e0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
P < 0.01e0
Comparator
RS24.5 and RS49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields of RS7 and RS14 were significantly higher than those of RS24.5 and RS49 (P < 0.01).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1547 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

RS14 with 120 mm irrigation may best increase yield while saving water in northern China.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RS14 with irrigation at 120 mme0
Outcome
increase yields and save watere0
Setting
northern Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RS14 with irrigation at 120 mm may be the best option to increase yields and save water in northern China.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1654 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.