Paper · 2012

Effects of long-term shade on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and yield in west of Liaoning province, Northeastern China

Fenghui Yuan; Dexin Guan; Anzhi Wang; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Light is one of the most important factors influencing crop growth and yield. With the aim of specially stressing the long-term shading effects in lowlight growing conditions on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and yield, a screen-shading experiment during the whole growing season was conducted in the northeastern China. In the experiment, four treatments of shading intensity (using screens with a light transmittance of 0.23, 0.38, 0.54 and 0.75) and control were employed to measure maize growth from germination to harvest. Leaf area index (LAI) and height (H) of the maize were measured at seedling, jointing, and booting stages; whereas yields of grain, cob, and stalk were measured during harvest. The results showed that maize growth and yield were seriously hindered by long-term shading. (1) The LAI of maize decreased mostly at the jointing stage, middle at booting stage and least at seedling stage.(2) The impact of the shading on the height of maize was similar among the three measuring stages, with relative heights of 0.65, 0.76, 0.85 and 0.94, respectively, for the four shading treatments. (3) Grain and cob yield dropped in a similar manner, with relative values of 0.21, 0.42, 0.66 and 0.87, respectively, for the four shading treatments. However, the maize stalk yield was comparatively higher, with relative values of 0.42, 0.56, 0.85 and 0.95, respectively, for the four shading treatments. In order to predict the growth and yield of maize under different light conditions, the regression equations between LAI, height, grain yield, cob yield, stalk yield and light transmittance were also established, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced maize LAI most at jointing, less at booting and least at seedling stage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
jointing stagee0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LAI of maize decreased mostly at the jointing stage, middle at booting stage and least at seedling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced height similarly across three stages, with relative heights 0.65, 0.76, 0.85 and 0.94 across four treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
similare0
Value
0.65, 0.76, 0.85 and 0.94e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The impact of the shading on the height of maize was similar among the three measuring stages, with relative heights of 0.65, 0.76, 0.85 and 0.94, respectively, for the four shading treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield fell under shading, with relative values 0.21, 0.42, 0.66 and 0.87.

Treatment
shading treatmentse0
Outcome
Graine0
Direction
droppede0
Value
0.21, 0.42, 0.66 and 0.87e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and cob yield dropped in a similar manner, with relative values of 0.21, 0.42, 0.66 and 0.87, respectively, for the four shading treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cob yield fell under shading, with relative values 0.21, 0.42, 0.66 and 0.87.

Treatment
shading treatmentse0
Outcome
cob yielde0
Direction
droppede0
Value
0.21, 0.42, 0.66 and 0.87e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and cob yield dropped in a similar manner, with relative values of 0.21, 0.42, 0.66 and 0.87, respectively, for the four shading treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk yield was relatively higher, at 0.42, 0.56, 0.85 and 0.95 of control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
shading treatmentse0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
comparatively highere0
Value
0.42, 0.56, 0.85 and 0.95e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maize stalk yield was comparatively higher, with relative values of 0.42, 0.56, 0.85 and 0.95, respectively, for the four shading treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1410 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression equations were established relating LAI, height and three yield traits to light transmittance.

Outcome
regression equationse0
Qualifier
LAI, height, grain yield, cob yield, stalk yield and light transmittancee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“the regression equations between LAI, height, grain yield, cob yield, stalk yield and light transmittance were also established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1622 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

46 papers: 2 positive, 44 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

shade · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

53 papers: 7 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.