Paper · 1998 · Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference

Effects of fungicide rates and timing on control of stripe rust in wheat

M. Braithwaite; M.G. Cromey; D.J. Saville; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to evaluate control options of stripe rust in a 1997/98 crop of spring sown Otane wheat near Methven. Three fungicides were evaluated for disease control, at half and label recommended application rates and at three timings. Disease levels were assessed at five dates. Plots were harvested and yield components recorded. In this trial where stripe rust appeared relatively early, the first spray had the greatest effect on disease severity. All three fungicides reduced disease severity compared to the untreated plots but azoxystrobin reduced disease more than epoxiconazole or tebuconazole. A full application of any of the three fungicides at application time 1 gave similar disease control to two half rate applications (Time 1 plus Time 2 or Time 3). Yield was significantly increased by both azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole at application Time 1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first fungicide spray had the greatest effect on stripe rust severity when rust appeared early.

Treatment
first spraye0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
stripe rust appeared relatively earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this trial where stripe rust appeared relatively early, the first spray had the greatest effect on disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

azoxystrobin reduced stripe rust severity relative to untreated plots.

Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three fungicides reduced disease severity compared to the untreated plots but azoxystrobin reduced disease more than epoxiconazole or tebuconazole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

epoxiconazole reduced stripe rust severity relative to untreated plots.

Treatment
epoxiconazolee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three fungicides reduced disease severity compared to the untreated plots but azoxystrobin reduced disease more than epoxiconazole or tebuconazole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

tebuconazole reduced stripe rust severity relative to untreated plots.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three fungicides reduced disease severity compared to the untreated plots but azoxystrobin reduced disease more than epoxiconazole or tebuconazole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin reduced stripe rust more than epoxiconazole.

Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reduced disease moree0
Comparator
epoxiconazolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three fungicides reduced disease severity compared to the untreated plots but azoxystrobin reduced disease more than epoxiconazole or tebuconazole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin reduced stripe rust more than tebuconazole.

Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reduced disease moree0
Comparator
tebuconazolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three fungicides reduced disease severity compared to the untreated plots but azoxystrobin reduced disease more than epoxiconazole or tebuconazole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A full rate at time 1 gave similar disease control to two half rate applications.

Treatment
A full application of any of the three fungicides at application time 1e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
two half rate applications (Time 1 plus Time 2 or Time 3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A full application of any of the three fungicides at application time 1 gave similar disease control to two half rate applications (Time 1 plus Time 2 or Time 3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

azoxystrobin at time 1 significantly increased wheat yield.

Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
application Time 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was significantly increased by both azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole at application Time 1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

epoxiconazole at time 1 significantly increased wheat yield.

Treatment
epoxiconazolee0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
application Time 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was significantly increased by both azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole at application Time 1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑

epoxiconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

azoxystrobin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

epoxiconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fungicide · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.