Abstract
The LandWISE project demonstrates minimum tillage for crop establishment on wind erosion prone soils. Conventional and no-tillage were compared for sweet corn production near Hastings. Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Sweet corn plant populations were similar under no-tillage and conventional tillage.
Verbatim
e0“Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sweet corn yield was similar under the two tillage treatments.
Verbatim
e0“Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil quality was higher under no-tillage.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →tillage · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.