Paper · 2002

Impact of tillage system on sweet corn yield and some soil properties: Year 2 of LandWISE Hawke's Bay

A. J. Pearson; LR Wilson

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The LandWISE project demonstrates minimum tillage for crop establishment on wind erosion prone soils. Conventional and no-tillage were compared for sweet corn production near Hastings. Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn plant populations were similar under no-tillage and conventional tillage.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
Sweet corn plant populationse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
two treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn yield was similar under the two tillage treatments.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
two treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil quality was higher under no-tillage.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
nitrate leaching lossese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn plant populations and yield were similar for the two treatments, but soil quality was higher and nitrate leaching losses were lower under no-tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–345 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

tillage · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 93 positive, 34 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.