Paper · 2015

Research article INFLUENCE OF PLANT POPULATION, PLANT PATTERNS AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON GRAIN YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CORN (ZEA MAYS L)

Masoud Mohseni; Mahmadiyor Sardarov; Mohammad Hossein Haddadi

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to investigate the effect of tillage systems and plant density in two plant pattern, on kernel yield and its component on corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704), an experimental design , randomized complete block in a strip factorial was used, treatments arrangement with four replications in north of Iran in 2010. Main plot was subjected to tillage systems in three levels: 1. Rotary system (RS). 2. Disk system (DS) - 3. Plow and Disck system (PDS). Other factors were plant density in three levels (60000, 70000 and 80000 plant/ha) and plant pattern were conventional row (linear) and new two rows (zigzag).The results indicated that the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by tillage systems did not show any significant difference,while the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by plant density showed significant difference. With the increase of density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha, grain yield and silage yield increased, an amount of from 9.793 to 10.92 and 62.68 to70.85 t/ha respectively. Grain yield and silage yield were not affected by plant pattern.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage systems produced no significant difference in corn grain yield.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not show any significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by tillage systems did not show any significant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage systems produced no significant difference in corn silage yield.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
silage yielde0
Direction
did not show any significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by tillage systems did not show any significant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected corn grain yield.

Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by plant density showed significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected corn silage yield.

Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
silage yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by plant density showed significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha increased grain yield from 9.793 to 10.92 t/ha.

Treatment
density from 60000 to 80000 plants/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.793 to 10.92e0
Comparator
60000e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha, grain yield and silage yield increased, an amount of from 9.793 to 10.92 and 62.68 to70.85 t/ha respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha increased silage yield from 62.68 to 70.85 t/ha.

Treatment
density from 60000 to 80000 plants/hae0
Outcome
silage yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
62.68 to70.85 t/hae0
Comparator
60000e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha, grain yield and silage yield increased, an amount of from 9.793 to 10.92 and 62.68 to70.85 t/ha respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant pattern did not affect corn grain yield.

Treatment
plant patterne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and silage yield were not affected by plant pattern.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant pattern did not affect corn silage yield.

Treatment
plant patterne0
Outcome
silage yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and silage yield were not affected by plant pattern.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–139 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.