Abstract
In the production of fruit trees it is important to set up a nursery always in a new site, alternatively to follow crop rotation rules. It is not always possible due to the size of a farm and production volume. In order to limit the effects of replant soil one can use different procedures before setting up a nursery. Chemical methods, however, must be replaced with non chemical ones due to environmental protection and reduction of production costs. In the experiment conducted in 2009-2012, growth of maiden pear trees of ‘Conference’ growing on three quince MA, MC, S1 rootstocks, cultivated in replant and non-replant soil after the use of mycorrhizal treatment, was compared. The strongest growth of maiden pear trees was obtained on non-replant soil with mycorrhizal and without mycorrhizal treatment of rootstocks. Inoculation of rootstocks influenced positively the height and fresh mass of the root system of maiden pear trees growing on two considered sites. On the other hand, inoculation did not rise the diameter of stem and number of lateral shoots of the maidens. Influence of mycorrhizal treatment of rootstocks on the length of lateral shoots was not obvious. Significantly the best results of maiden pear trees growth, except for the stem diameter, were obtained on MA quince compared to two other types. The mycorrhizal treatment gave better result of percentage obtained by maiden pear trees only in the replant site. The best efficiency of maiden pear trees in nursery production was observed for MA quince rootstock.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Maiden pear trees grew strongest in non-replant soil, with or without mycorrhizal treatment.
- Taxon
- pear trees
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communise0 - Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- strongeste0
- Setting
- non-replant soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The strongest growth of maiden pear trees was obtained on non-replant soil with mycorrhizal and without mycorrhizal treatment of rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock inoculation increased pear tree height and root fresh mass at both sites.
- Taxon
- pear treesPyrus communise0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of rootstockse0
- Outcome
- height and fresh mass of the root systeme0
- Direction
- positivelye0
- Setting
- two considered sitese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of rootstocks influenced positively the height and fresh mass of the root system of maiden pear trees growing on two considered sites”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock inoculation did not increase pear stem diameter or lateral shoot number.
- Taxon
- pear treesPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- inoculatione0
- Outcome
- diameter of stem and number of lateral shootse0
- Direction
- did not risee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation did not rise the diameter of stem and number of lateral shoots of the maidens”
t0“pear trees”
Claim · model-written summary
The effect of mycorrhizal rootstock treatment on lateral shoot length was unclear.
- Taxon
- pear treesPyrus communist0
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal treatment of rootstockse0
- Outcome
- length of lateral shootse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Influence of mycorrhizal treatment of rootstocks on the length of lateral shoots was not obvious”
t0“pear trees”
Claim · model-written summary
MA quince rootstock gave the best pear growth results except stem diameter.
- Taxon
- pear treesPyrus communise0
- Material
- MA quincee0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- except for the stem diametere0
- Comparator
- two other typese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly the best results of maiden pear trees growth, except for the stem diameter, were obtained on MA quince compared to two other types”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal treatment improved the percentage of maiden pear trees obtained only at the replant site.
- Taxon
- pear treesPyrus communise0
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal treatmente0
- Outcome
- percentage obtainede0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Setting
- replant sitee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mycorrhizal treatment gave better result of percentage obtained by maiden pear trees only in the replant site”
Claim · model-written summary
MA quince rootstock had the best nursery production efficiency for maiden pear trees.
- Taxon
- pear treesPyrus communise0
- Material
- MA quince rootstocke0
- Outcome
- efficiencye0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best efficiency of maiden pear trees in nursery production was observed for MA quince rootstock”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →grafting · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.