Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pyrodwarf rootstock produced the largest leaf area.

A claim from Evaluating the effect of rootstocks and potassium level on photosynthetic productivity and yield of pear trees · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrodwarf rootstock produced the largest leaf area.

Treatment
Pyrodwarf rootstocke0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
biggeste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees budded on the Pyrodwarf rootstock had the biggest leaf area and the highest photosynthetic efficiency, photosynthesis rate, and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–392
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–110

Title

Evaluating the effect of rootstocks and potassium level on photosynthetic productivity and yield of pear trees

K. Bosa; E. Jadczuk-Tobjasz; M. H. Kalaji; et al. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 2014. doi:10.1134/s1021443714020022

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-bd01eeeae0cbb1c058b45d2a0a79ce84d64fb6be79005a21854c809665f87cec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

grafting · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    The Dargazi genotype on PyroDwarf rootstock had fruit weight of 195.04 g, 96.20% higher than Beyrouti.

    The rootstock type affecting fruit yield, and quality, and fire blight resistance of ‘Dargazi’ and ‘Beyrouti’ pear genotypes · 2025 · compared with Beyrouti

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Rootstock cultivars did not differentiate growth of Chojuro and Whasan scions.

    Field Performance Test of 'Baeyun No. 1' Selected as Resistant Rootstock against Some Physiological Disorders of Pear Fruits · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    BP 1 and OHF rootstocks gave more vigour than quince BA 29 or EMA.

    Performance of ‘Coscia’ pear (Pyrus communis) on seven rootstocks in a warm climate · 2007 · compared with quince BA 29 or EMA

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Rootstock inoculation increased pear tree height and root fresh mass at both sites.

    Maiden pear trees growth in replant soil after inoculation of rootstocks with mycorrhizal inoculum · 2015

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Both clonal rootstocks induced higher growth in pear cultivars

    Growth and Nutrients Uptake in Commercial Pear Cultivars on Seedling, Pyrodwarf® and OH × F69 Rootstocks · 2021

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Compatibility group A pear varieties develop better on quince rootstock than on pear rootstock.

    Signs of incompatibility of grafting components in scion-rootstock combinations of pear with common quince · 2023 · compared with pear rootstock

    Same direction

  7. positive
    V grafting made sapling development more intense, with numerous lateral shoots, than omega grafting.

    Comparative Study of Two Bench Grafting Methods at Apple (Malus domestica, Borkh.) and Pear (Pyrus communis, L.) · 2013 · compared with omega grafting

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Top grafting significantly increased growth vigor.

    Changes in growth and photosynthetic capabilities of top grafted pear seedling shoots · 2007

    Same direction

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.