Abstract
This experiment has been conducted in order to study the effects of different biofertilizers and manure on absorption of some micronutrients by wheat in Alborz Province, Iran. Experimental design was factorial in the form of randomized complete block design with three replications. Four factors of the experiment were Azospirillum (600 g/ha and without), Mycorrhiza (with 1 kg/ha and without), Streptomyces (0.5 kg/ha and without) and manure (30 ton/ha and without). Results showed significant effect of Azospirillum, Mycorrhiza and manure at p 0.01 on measured traits but the effect of Streptomyces was not significant. All twofold and threefold interactions significantly affected absorption of four micronutrients, mostly at p 0.01. Although because of adverse effect of Streptomyces on Mycorrhiza, fourfold interactions were not much better than threefolds, but the highest absorptions of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu happened in fourfold interactions. In interaction of Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure (a m s o ), plants shoot contained 1 1 0 1 246.77 mg/kg Iron, 56.91 mg/kg Manganese, 13.03 mg/kg Zinc and 4.52 mg/kg Cupper that were much higher than any other treatments. Totally, results indicated that biofertilizers and manure can naturally meat large amount of plants nutritional requirements and replace chemical fertilizers in sustainable agricultural production systems.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum significantly affected the measured wheat traits at p 0.01.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Azospirillume1
- Outcome
- measured traitse1
- Value
- p 0.01e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Results showed significant effect of Azospirillum, Mycorrhiza and manure at p 0.01 on measured traits but the effect of Streptomyces was not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhiza significantly affected the measured wheat traits at p 0.01.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizae1
- Outcome
- measured traitse1
- Value
- p 0.01e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Results showed significant effect of Azospirillum, Mycorrhiza and manure at p 0.01 on measured traits but the effect of Streptomyces was not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure significantly affected the measured wheat traits at p 0.01.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- manuree1
- Outcome
- measured traitse1
- Value
- p 0.01e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Results showed significant effect of Azospirillum, Mycorrhiza and manure at p 0.01 on measured traits but the effect of Streptomyces was not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Streptomyces did not significantly affect the measured wheat traits.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Streptomycese1
- Outcome
- measured traitse1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Results showed significant effect of Azospirillum, Mycorrhiza and manure at p 0.01 on measured traits but the effect of Streptomyces was not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
All twofold and threefold interactions significantly affected the absorption of four micronutrients, mostly at p 0.01.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- twofold and threefold interactionse2
- Outcome
- absorption of four micronutrientse2
- Value
- p 0.01e2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e2“All twofold and threefold interactions significantly affected absorption of four micronutrients, mostly at p 0.01”
Claim · model-written summary
The adverse effect of Streptomyces on Mycorrhiza reduced the benefit of fourfold interactions.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Streptomycese3
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizae3symbiont
- Outcome
- adverse effecte3
- Direction
- adversee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e3“Although because of adverse effect of Streptomyces on Mycorrhiza, fourfold interactions were not much better than threefolds”
Claim · model-written summary
Fourfold interactions were not much better than threefold interactions for micronutrient absorption.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- fourfold interactionse3
- Outcome
- absorptionse4
- Direction
- not much bettere3
- Comparator
- threefoldse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e3“Although because of adverse effect of Streptomyces on Mycorrhiza, fourfold interactions were not much better than threefolds”
e4“but the highest absorptions of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu happened in fourfold interactions”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest absorptions of Fe, Mn and Zn occurred in fourfold interactions.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- fourfold interactionse4
- Outcome
- Fe, Mn, Zne4
- Direction
- higheste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e4“but the highest absorptions of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu happened in fourfold interactions”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest absorption of Cu occurred in fourfold interactions.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- fourfold interactionse4
- Outcome
- Cue4
- Direction
- higheste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e4“but the highest absorptions of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu happened in fourfold interactions”
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure interaction gave plant shoot Iron of 246.77 mg/kg, much higher than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- plants shoote5
- Treatment
- Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manuree5
- Outcome
- Irone5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 246.77 mg/kge5
- Comparator
- any other treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e5“In interaction of Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure (a m s o ), plants shoot contained 1 1 0 1 246.77 mg/kg Iron, 56.91 mg/kg Manganese, 13.03 mg/kg Zinc and 4.52 mg/kg Cupper that were much higher than any other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure interaction gave plant shoot Manganese of 56.91 mg/kg, much higher than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- plants shoote5
- Treatment
- Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manuree5
- Outcome
- Manganesee5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 56.91 mg/kge5
- Comparator
- any other treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e5“In interaction of Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure (a m s o ), plants shoot contained 1 1 0 1 246.77 mg/kg Iron, 56.91 mg/kg Manganese, 13.03 mg/kg Zinc and 4.52 mg/kg Cupper that were much higher than any other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure interaction gave plant shoot Zinc of 13.03 mg/kg, much higher than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- plants shoote5
- Treatment
- Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manuree5
- Outcome
- Zince5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 13.03 mg/kge5
- Comparator
- any other treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e5“In interaction of Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure (a m s o ), plants shoot contained 1 1 0 1 246.77 mg/kg Iron, 56.91 mg/kg Manganese, 13.03 mg/kg Zinc and 4.52 mg/kg Cupper that were much higher than any other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure interaction gave plant shoot Copper of 4.52 mg/kg, much higher than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- plants shoote5
- Treatment
- Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manuree5
- Outcome
- Cuppere5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 4.52 mg/kge5
- Comparator
- any other treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e5“In interaction of Azospirillum × Mycorrhiza × manure (a m s o ), plants shoot contained 1 1 0 1 246.77 mg/kg Iron, 56.91 mg/kg Manganese, 13.03 mg/kg Zinc and 4.52 mg/kg Cupper that were much higher than any other treatments”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
955 papers more in this group
See all 959 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.