Paper · 2009 · American-Asian-Journal of agricultural & environmental sciences/American-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental sciences

Influence of the co-inoculation Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium meliloti plus 2,4-D on grain yield and N, P, K content of Triticum aestivum (cv. Baccros and Mahdavi).

Mahdiye Askary; Akbar Mostajeran; R. Amooaghaei; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
50
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

4 Abstract: Co-inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms to create a successful system of biological nitrogen fixation in a non-legumes crop can lead to many profits for plant. The aim of this work was to evaluate the single and co-inoculation effects of Azospirillum basilense (native or Sp7) and Rhizobium meliloti (native or DSMZ 30135) plus 2,4-D on grain yield and the total N, P and K content of the grain. The results indicated that co-inoculation of wheat seeds with A. brasilense and R. meliloti had positive and significant effects on the grain yield and N, P and K content of the wheat grains in compared to either single inoculation or control plants. In overall, the average grain yield was increased to 53.8% of co-inoculation plants with a mixture of A. brasilense and R. meliloti compared to the control plants. This was due to increasing number of grains (26%) and grain weight per plant (22%) in co-inoculated plants. The results showed that single inoculation with Azospirillum produced significantly higher grain yield by 29% and the grains contain more N (22.8%), P (59.5%) and K (34%) compared to the control plants. Simultaneously, co-inoculation increased the mentioned parameters by 53.8, 52, 114 and 82%, respectively compared to the control Therefore, the effect of either the single or dual inoculation of wheat with A. brasilense and R. meliloti could result higher grain yield with better quality. However the effect of single and/or co-inoculation on plant growth parameters varies depending on the strain of A. brasilense (Sp7 and native), wheat cultivars and selected of co-inoculants (type of mixed strains). The highest grain yield and also N, P and K in grain were observed in combination of the local strains (native A. brasilense and native R. meliloti) when concentration of 10 cfu ml and 10 cfu ml 71 3 1 were used respectively for the strains plus 2 ppm of 2,4-D.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 53.8% over controls.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
co-inoculatione0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Second interactor
R. melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.8%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“In overall, the average grain yield was increased to 53.8% of co-inoculation plants with a mixture of A. brasilense and R. meliloti compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased grain number by 26%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
co-inoculated plantse0
Outcome
number of grainse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was due to increasing number of grains (26%) and grain weight per plant (22%) in co-inoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased grain weight per plant by 22%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
co-inoculated plantse0
Outcome
grain weight per plante0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was due to increasing number of grains (26%) and grain weight per plant (22%) in co-inoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single Azospirillum inoculation increased grain yield by 29%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single inoculation with Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“single inoculation with Azospirillum produced significantly higher grain yield by 29% and the grains contain more N (22.8%), P (59.5%) and K (34%) compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single Azospirillum inoculation increased grain N by 22.8%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single inoculation with Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
moree0
Value
22.8%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“single inoculation with Azospirillum produced significantly higher grain yield by 29% and the grains contain more N (22.8%), P (59.5%) and K (34%) compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single Azospirillum inoculation increased grain P by 59.5%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single inoculation with Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
moree0
Value
59.5%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“single inoculation with Azospirillum produced significantly higher grain yield by 29% and the grains contain more N (22.8%), P (59.5%) and K (34%) compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single Azospirillum inoculation increased grain K by 34%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single inoculation with Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
moree0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“single inoculation with Azospirillum produced significantly higher grain yield by 29% and the grains contain more N (22.8%), P (59.5%) and K (34%) compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased grain N by 52% over controls.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
co-inoculatione0
Outcome
mentioned parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
52e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“co-inoculation increased the mentioned parameters by 53.8, 52, 114 and 82%, respectively compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased grain P by 114% over controls.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
co-inoculatione0
Outcome
mentioned parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
114e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“co-inoculation increased the mentioned parameters by 53.8, 52, 114 and 82%, respectively compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased grain K by 82% over controls.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
co-inoculatione0
Outcome
mentioned parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
82%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“co-inoculation increased the mentioned parameters by 53.8, 52, 114 and 82%, respectively compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1267 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation effects varied with bacterial strain, wheat cultivar and co-inoculant.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single and/or co-inoculatione0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Qualifier
varies depending on the strain of A. brasilense (Sp7 and native), wheat cultivars and selected of co-inoculantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“the effect of single and/or co-inoculation on plant growth parameters varies depending on the strain of A. brasilense (Sp7 and native), wheat cultivars and selected of co-inoculants (type of mixed strains).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1642 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local strain combination with 2,4-D gave the highest grain yield and N, P and K.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combination of the local strains (native A. brasilense and native R. meliloti)e0
Interactor
native A. brasilensee0symbiont
Second interactor
native R. melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
highest grain yield and also N, P and K in graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest grain yield and also N, P and K in grain were observed in combination of the local strains (native A. brasilense and native R. meliloti) when concentration of 10 cfu ml and 10 cfu ml 71 3 1 were used respectively for the strains plus 2 ppm of 2,4-D.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1904 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · Azospirillum brasilense · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.