Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen uptake by wheat grains and straw significantly increased with the inoculation treatment.

A claim from Wheat Response to Azospirillum Inoculation, Organic Amendments and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer with Application of 15N Stable Isotope Technique · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake by wheat grains and straw significantly increased with the inoculation treatment.

Material
Sakha 93e0
Treatment
inoculation treatmente1
Outcome
Nitrogen uptake by grains and strawe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Sakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–451
e1

“Nitrogen uptake by grains and straw significantly increased by increasing nitrogen fertilizer rates and inoculation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1443

Title

Wheat Response to Azospirillum Inoculation, Organic Amendments and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer with Application of 15N Stable Isotope Technique

M. Soliman Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2018. doi:10.21608/jssae.2018.36519

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-e37913244ec56ac6c8646056246489e4b5f319479ee2d27c0e7186fb875d0aa1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

268 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.