Paper · 2021 · Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications

"Effect of P Rates Combined With PDB on Nutrients Uptake by Wheat Grown Under Organic Farming of Sandy Soil Using 15N Tracer Technique"

Yehia Galal; Zaki Zaki; Fahmy Habib; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation as well as different rates of natural rock P fertilizer (NRP) was traced. Grain yield of wheat was higher with 100 kg P ha-1 than rate 50 kg P ha-1 while both of them surpassed the un-fertilized control. In case of inoculated plants, grain yield was significantly higher with quail feces additives than animal manure and peanut residues. B. megatherium induced slight increases in N uptake comparing to the un-inoculated plants. Peanut residues, but slightly, resulted in N uptake values higher than either quail feces or animal manure. Increasing rock-P levels increased N uptake over the unfertilized or those received 50 kg ha-1 treatments. Added quail feces had increased P uptake over those resulted from peanut residues and animal manure. Quail feces resulted in relative increase of P uptake by about 5% and 15%; 16% and 19%; 17% and 4% over peanut and animal manure for P0, P50 and P100, respectively. Inoculation with B. megatherium had, to some extent, enhanced K uptake by grains comparable to the un-inoculated one when plants treated with peanut residues. Nitrogen portion derived from (Ndforg) peanut straw and quail feces to inoculated plants was relatively increased, on mean average basis, by about 19% and 16%, respectively over the un-inoculated plants. Efficient use of N derived from peanut straw and quail feces (Org-NUE %) as well as urea-NUE% by inoculated plants was slightly increased under all rock-P levels over those of the un-inoculated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was higher with 100 kg P ha-1 of natural rock phosphate than with 50 kg P ha-1.

Treatment
100 kg P ha-1e1
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
50 kg P ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Grain yield of wheat was higher with 100 kg P ha-1 than rate 50 kg P ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield with both the 50 and 100 kg P ha-1 rock phosphate rates surpassed the un-fertilized control.

Treatment
natural rock P fertilizer (NRP)e0
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Direction
surpassede1
Comparator
un-fertilized controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different rates of natural rock P fertilizer (NRP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of wheat was higher with 100 kg P ha-1 than rate 50 kg P ha-1 while both of them surpassed the un-fertilized control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In inoculated wheat, grain yield was significantly higher with quail feces additives than with animal manure and peanut residues.

Treatment
quail feces additivese1
Interactor
B. megatheriume0other
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
animal manure and peanut residuese1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In case of inoculated plants, grain yield was significantly higher with quail feces additives than animal manure and peanut residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. megatherium inoculation slightly increased N uptake of wheat compared with un-inoculated plants.

Treatment
B. megatheriume1
Interactor
B. megatheriume0other
Outcome
N uptakee1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
slighte1
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. megatherium induced slight increases in N uptake comparing to the un-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut residues gave slightly higher wheat N uptake values than quail feces or animal manure.

Treatment
Peanut residuese1
Outcome
N uptake valuese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
quail feces or animal manuree1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut residues, but slightly, resulted in N uptake values higher than either quail feces or animal manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing rock-P levels increased wheat N uptake over the unfertilized treatment and the 50 kg ha-1 treatment.

Treatment
rock-P levelse1
Outcome
N uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
unfertilized or those received 50 kg ha-1e1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing rock-P levels increased N uptake over the unfertilized or those received 50 kg ha-1 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added quail feces increased wheat P uptake over peanut residues and animal manure.

Treatment
quail fecese1
Outcome
P uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
peanut residues and animal manuree1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Added quail feces had increased P uptake over those resulted from peanut residues and animal manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the P0 rock-P level, quail feces raised wheat P uptake by 5% and 15% relative to peanut residues and animal manure respectively.

Treatment
Quail fecese1
Outcome
P uptakee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
5% and 15%e1
Qualifier
P0e1
Comparator
peanut and animal manuree1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quail feces resulted in relative increase of P uptake by about 5% and 15%; 16% and 19%; 17% and 4% over peanut and animal manure for P0, P50 and P100, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the P50 rock-P level, quail feces raised wheat P uptake by 16% and 19% relative to peanut residues and animal manure respectively.

Treatment
Quail fecese1
Outcome
P uptakee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
16% and 19%e1
Qualifier
P50e1
Comparator
peanut and animal manuree1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quail feces resulted in relative increase of P uptake by about 5% and 15%; 16% and 19%; 17% and 4% over peanut and animal manure for P0, P50 and P100, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the P100 rock-P level, quail feces raised wheat P uptake by 17% and 4% relative to peanut residues and animal manure respectively.

Treatment
Quail fecese1
Outcome
P uptakee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
17% and 4%e1
Qualifier
P100e1
Comparator
peanut and animal manuree1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quail feces resulted in relative increase of P uptake by about 5% and 15%; 16% and 19%; 17% and 4% over peanut and animal manure for P0, P50 and P100, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. megatherium inoculation somewhat enhanced K uptake by wheat grains compared with the un-inoculated treatment when plants received peanut residues.

Organ / stage
grainse1
Treatment
Inoculation with B. megatheriume1
Interactor
B. megatheriume0other
Outcome
K uptakee1
Direction
enhancede1
Qualifier
when plants treated with peanut residuese1
Comparator
un-inoculated onee1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with B. megatherium had, to some extent, enhanced K uptake by grains comparable to the un-inoculated one when plants treated with peanut residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated wheat plants had on average about 19% more nitrogen derived from peanut straw than un-inoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculated plantse1
Interactor
B. megatheriume0other
Outcome
Nitrogen portion derived from (Ndforg) peanut strawe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
19%e1
Qualifier
on mean average basise1
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen portion derived from (Ndforg) peanut straw and quail feces to inoculated plants was relatively increased, on mean average basis, by about 19% and 16%, respectively over the un-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated wheat plants had on average about 16% more nitrogen derived from quail feces than un-inoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculated plantse1
Interactor
B. megatheriume0other
Outcome
Nitrogen portion derived from (Ndforg) peanut straw and quail fecese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16%e1
Qualifier
on mean average basise1
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen portion derived from (Ndforg) peanut straw and quail feces to inoculated plants was relatively increased, on mean average basis, by about 19% and 16%, respectively over the un-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficient use of N derived from peanut straw and quail feces, and urea-NUE, was slightly increased in inoculated wheat plants under all rock-P levels relative to un-inoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculated plantse1
Interactor
B. megatheriume0other
Outcome
Efficient use of N derived from peanut straw and quail feces (Org-NUE %) as well as urea-NUE%e1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
slightlye1
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, wheat response to organic amendments and B. megatherium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Efficient use of N derived from peanut straw and quail feces (Org-NUE %) as well as urea-NUE% by inoculated plants was slightly increased under all rock-P levels over those of the un-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1565 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 24 positive, 8 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.