Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Single Azospirillum inoculation increased grain P by 59.5%.

A claim from Influence of the co-inoculation Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium meliloti plus 2,4-D on grain yield and N, P, K content of Triticum aestivum (cv. Baccros and Mahdavi). · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single Azospirillum inoculation increased grain P by 59.5%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single inoculation with Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
moree0
Value
59.5%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–145
e0

“single inoculation with Azospirillum produced significantly higher grain yield by 29% and the grains contain more N (22.8%), P (59.5%) and K (34%) compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1138

Title

Influence of the co-inoculation Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium meliloti plus 2,4-D on grain yield and N, P, K content of Triticum aestivum (cv. Baccros and Mahdavi).

Mahdiye Askary; Akbar Mostajeran; R. Amooaghaei; et al. American-Asian-Journal of agricultural & environmental sciences/American-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental sciences 2009

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ca47ffee2f1b83da67e87df7141e3eb21be5920909c36575964d380aa85d105c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

268 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.