Abstract
SUMMARY Damages caused by late-spring frosts in cherry growing are frequently, in Transylvania, Romania. The results referring to lower damages in cherry growing caused by late spring frost, in 2011, at SC Agroindustiala SA Cluj-Napoca are presented. The biological material was represented by 2000 trees of each cherry cultivars: ‘Stella’, ‘Van’, ‘Germersdorf’, ‘Boambe de Cotnari’. In order to reduce damage caused by late spring frost, there were applied the following treatments: I. Damisol BB 5Kg/ha; II. a mixture consisting of boric acid 70 g/l + glutamic acid 130 g/l, 6 l/ha; III. a mixture consisting of boric acid 60g/l and aspartic acid 120 g/l, and Campfo Ca, in the amount of 6 l/ha. The application of all chemical treatments substantially reduced the level of damage due to late-spring frosts. Compared to untreated control where average production obtained was 0.4 t/ha, in the variant treated with Damisol BB the yield was 3.5 t/ha, in case of Mixture II 1.6 t/ha and 8 t/ha using Mixture III, the differences being statistically assured. Among cultivars there were no differences statistically assured. Tab. 1 Effect of chemical treatments and cultivars upon average cherries yield (t/ha), following the late spring frosts, in 2011, at Cluj-Napoca
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The chemical treatments substantially reduced late-spring frost damage in cherry.
- Taxon
- cherryt0
- Treatment
- all chemical treatmentse0
- Outcome
- level of damage due to late-spring frostse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The application of all chemical treatments substantially reduced the level of damage due to late-spring frosts.”
t0“Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Damisol BB treatment yielded 3.5 t/ha versus 0.4 t/ha in untreated control.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to untreated control where average production obtained was 0.4 t/ha, in the variant treated with Damisol BB the yield was 3.5 t/ha”
t0“Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixture II yielded 1.6 t/ha versus 0.4 t/ha in untreated control.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to untreated control where average production obtained was 0.4 t/ha, in the variant treated with Damisol BB the yield was 3.5 t/ha, in case of Mixture II 1.6 t/ha and 8 t/ha using Mixture III, the differences being statistically assured.”
t0“Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixture III yielded 8 t/ha versus 0.4 t/ha in untreated control.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to untreated control where average production obtained was 0.4 t/ha, in the variant treated with Damisol BB the yield was 3.5 t/ha, in case of Mixture II 1.6 t/ha and 8 t/ha using Mixture III, the differences being statistically assured.”
t0“Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
The cherry cultivars had no statistically assured differences.
Verbatim
e0“Among cultivars there were no differences statistically assured.”
t0“Cherry”