Paper · 2010 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Influence of pruning intensity on flowering, fruit yields and floral malformation in three mango cultivars planted under high density.

Sanjay Kumar Singh; Sanjay Singh; R.R. Sharma; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
16
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 2005–07 on influence of pruning intensity on flowering, fruit yield and floral malformation in three mango cultivars (‘Amrapali’, ‘Mallika’ and ‘Dashehari’) planted under high density. The pruning intensity at moderate level took least days to 50% flowering, had highest number of panicles per branch (5.13, 5.66), longest blooming period (22.00, 22.66 days) and lowest sex ratio (7.41, 6.85) while no-pruning (control) had delayed flowering with lowest number of panicles per branch, shortest bloom period but then highest sex ratio. Moderate pruning drastically reduced the floral malformed panicles (9.40, 11.21) than the control (51.23, 41.39). The control (un-pruned) trees in all cultivars showed the higher malformation incidence, while lower was registered after pruning. Fruit drop and yield were also significantly affected by pruning intensity. The fruit drop reduced significantly with severe pruning (77.19, 78.43%), which was lower than the control (86.53, 87.76%). Moderately pruned trees had the highest fruit yield (6.55, 8.59 kg tree−1) than un-pruned ones (5.10, 6.45 kg tree−1) and they also had maximum number of fruits per panicle. Conclusively, the light pruning for ‘Amrapali’, moderate for ‘Mallika’ and severe pruning for ‘Dashehari’ can be recommended for restoring the production and productivity in high density orchards.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate pruning produced the least days to 50% flowering compared with no pruning.

Treatment
moderatee0
Outcome
days to 50% floweringe0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
no-pruning (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pruning intensity at moderate level took least days to 50% flowering, had highest number of panicles per branch (5.13, 5.66), longest blooming period (22.00, 22.66 days) and lowest sex ratio (7.41, 6.85) while no-pruning (control) had delayed flowering with lowest number of panicles per branch, shortest bloom period but then highest sex ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate pruning produced the highest number of panicles per branch compared with no pruning.

Treatment
moderatee0
Outcome
number of panicles per branche0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.13, 5.66e0
Comparator
no-pruning (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pruning intensity at moderate level took least days to 50% flowering, had highest number of panicles per branch (5.13, 5.66), longest blooming period (22.00, 22.66 days) and lowest sex ratio (7.41, 6.85) while no-pruning (control) had delayed flowering with lowest number of panicles per branch, shortest bloom period but then highest sex ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate pruning produced the longest blooming period compared with no pruning.

Treatment
moderatee0
Outcome
blooming periode0
Direction
longeste0
Value
22.00, 22.66 dayse0
Comparator
no-pruning (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pruning intensity at moderate level took least days to 50% flowering, had highest number of panicles per branch (5.13, 5.66), longest blooming period (22.00, 22.66 days) and lowest sex ratio (7.41, 6.85) while no-pruning (control) had delayed flowering with lowest number of panicles per branch, shortest bloom period but then highest sex ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate pruning produced the lowest sex ratio compared with no pruning.

Treatment
moderatee0
Outcome
sex ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.41, 6.85e0
Comparator
no-pruning (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pruning intensity at moderate level took least days to 50% flowering, had highest number of panicles per branch (5.13, 5.66), longest blooming period (22.00, 22.66 days) and lowest sex ratio (7.41, 6.85) while no-pruning (control) had delayed flowering with lowest number of panicles per branch, shortest bloom period but then highest sex ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate pruning reduced malformed panicles relative to control.

Treatment
Moderate pruninge0
Outcome
floral malformed paniclese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9.40, 11.21e0
Qualifier
51.23, 41.39e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate pruning drastically reduced the floral malformed panicles (9.40, 11.21) than the control (51.23, 41.39).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe pruning significantly reduced fruit drop relative to control.

Treatment
severe pruninge0
Outcome
fruit drope0
Direction
reducede0
Value
77.19, 78.43%e0
Qualifier
86.53, 87.76%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit drop reduced significantly with severe pruning (77.19, 78.43%), which was lower than the control (86.53, 87.76%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate pruning gave the highest fruit yield relative to unpruned trees.

Treatment
Moderately prunede0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.55, 8.59 kg tree−1e0
Qualifier
5.10, 6.45 kg tree−1e0
Comparator
un-pruned onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderately pruned trees had the highest fruit yield (6.55, 8.59 kg tree−1) than un-pruned ones (5.10, 6.45 kg tree−1) and they also had maximum number of fruits per panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate pruning gave the maximum number of fruits per panicle.

Treatment
Moderately prunede0
Outcome
number of fruits per paniclee0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
un-pruned onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderately pruned trees had the highest fruit yield (6.55, 8.59 kg tree−1) than un-pruned ones (5.10, 6.45 kg tree−1) and they also had maximum number of fruits per panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended light pruning for ‘Amrapali’ to restore productivity in high density orchards.

Material
‘Amrapali’e0
Treatment
light pruninge0
Outcome
restoring the production and productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conclusively, the light pruning for ‘Amrapali’, moderate for ‘Mallika’ and severe pruning for ‘Dashehari’ can be recommended for restoring the production and productivity in high density orchards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended moderate for ‘Mallika’ to restore productivity in high density orchards.

Material
‘Mallika’e0
Treatment
moderatee0
Outcome
restoring the production and productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conclusively, the light pruning for ‘Amrapali’, moderate for ‘Mallika’ and severe pruning for ‘Dashehari’ can be recommended for restoring the production and productivity in high density orchards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended severe pruning for ‘Dashehari’ to restore productivity in high density orchards.

Material
‘Dashehari’e0
Treatment
severe pruninge0
Outcome
restoring the production and productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conclusively, the light pruning for ‘Amrapali’, moderate for ‘Mallika’ and severe pruning for ‘Dashehari’ can be recommended for restoring the production and productivity in high density orchards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 41 positive, 7 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.