Paper · 2013 · Fruits

Pruning affects fruit yield and postharvest quality in mango ( Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapali

Ram Asrey; Vishwa Bandhu Patel; Kalyan Barman; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
44
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract – Introduction . Mango fruits grown under high-density planting show a progressive decline in crop yield after 14–15 years, due to overcrowding of canopies, which suggests regular canopy management is necessary. Hence, the effects of pruning treatment on fruit yield and quality of ‘Amrapali’ mango were studied in India over two consecutive years, 2010 and 2011. Materials and methods . Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control. Fruits were harvested at the commercial maturity stage and quality parameters were assessed both in fresh fruits and following ripening at room temperature [(35 ± 2) °C and (80 ± 5)% RH)]. Results and discussion . Fruit yield of pruned trees was found to decrease during the first year compared with the fruit yield of unpruned trees; later on, it increased during the second year. Pruning resulted in significantly higher fruit weight, fruit firmness, total carotenoids, antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content. Early maturity of fruits was observed from unpruned trees with faster color change, higher total soluble solids and lower titratable acidity. The fruits harvested from pruned trees showed slower ripening, and lower respiration, ethylene evolution rate and enzyme activity as compared with fruits from unpruned trees. Both anthracnose and stem-end rot disease percentage were reduced in ripe fruits from pruned trees. Conclusion . Pruning treatment appears to be an alternative strategy to obtain better yield and quality in densely populated old mango orchards.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruned mango trees had lower fruit yield than unpruned trees during the first year.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
pruninge1
Outcome
Fruit yielde2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
during the first yeare2
Comparator
unpruned treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit yield of pruned trees was found to decrease during the first year compared with the fruit yield of unpruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruned mango trees had higher fruit yield than unpruned trees during the second year.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
pruninge1
Outcome
Fruit yielde2
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
during the second yeare3
Comparator
unpruned treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit yield of pruned trees was found to decrease during the first year compared with the fruit yield of unpruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–881 · show in text ↑
e3

“later on, it increased during the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning significantly increased fruit weight, fruit firmness and total carotenoids compared with unpruned trees.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
pruninge4
Outcome
fruit weight, fruit firmness, total carotenoidse4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
unpruned treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e4

“Pruning resulted in significantly higher fruit weight, fruit firmness, total carotenoids, antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning significantly increased antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content compared with unpruned trees.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
pruninge4
Outcome
antioxidant capacity and total phenolic contente4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
unpruned treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e4

“Pruning resulted in significantly higher fruit weight, fruit firmness, total carotenoids, antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1067 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early maturity of fruit was observed from unpruned mango trees.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Outcome
Early maturity of fruitse5
Qualifier
from unpruned treese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e5

“Early maturity of fruits was observed from unpruned trees with faster color change, higher total soluble solids and lower titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from unpruned mango trees changed colour faster.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Outcome
color changee5
Direction
fastere5
Qualifier
from unpruned treese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e5

“Early maturity of fruits was observed from unpruned trees with faster color change, higher total soluble solids and lower titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from unpruned mango trees had higher total soluble solids.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Outcome
total soluble solidse5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
from unpruned treese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e5

“Early maturity of fruits was observed from unpruned trees with faster color change, higher total soluble solids and lower titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from unpruned mango trees had lower titratable acidity.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Outcome
titratable aciditye5
Direction
lowere5
Qualifier
from unpruned treese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e5

“Early maturity of fruits was observed from unpruned trees with faster color change, higher total soluble solids and lower titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from pruned mango trees ripened more slowly than fruit from unpruned trees.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
pruned treese6
Outcome
ripeninge6
Direction
slowere6
Comparator
unpruned treese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e6

“The fruits harvested from pruned trees showed slower ripening, and lower respiration, ethylene evolution rate and enzyme activity as compared with fruits from unpruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from pruned mango trees had lower respiration, ethylene evolution rate and enzyme activity than fruit from unpruned trees.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
pruned treese6
Outcome
respiration, ethylene evolution rate and enzyme activitye6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
unpruned treese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e6

“The fruits harvested from pruned trees showed slower ripening, and lower respiration, ethylene evolution rate and enzyme activity as compared with fruits from unpruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning reduced anthracnose and stem-end rot disease percentage in ripe fruit.

Taxon
Mango treesMangifera indicae1
Treatment
pruned treese7
Outcome
anthracnose and stem-end rot disease percentagee7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mango trees were subjected to pruning (removal of 50 cm of shoot from the apex) in the month of September 2009 with unpruned trees serving as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–546 · show in text ↑
e7

“Both anthracnose and stem-end rot disease percentage were reduced in ripe fruits from pruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1484 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning appears to be an alternative strategy for better yield and quality in densely populated old mango orchards.

Treatment
Pruning treatmente4
Outcome
better yield and qualitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Pruning treatment appears to be an alternative strategy to obtain better yield and quality in densely populated old mango orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1629 · show in text ↑

pruning · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 41 positive, 7 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

pruning · physiology: pigments · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.