Paper · 2008 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Anatomy and physiology of graft incompatibility in solanaceous plants

M. Kawaguchi; A. Taji; D. Backhouse; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
122
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryGraft incompatibility in solanaceous plants was investigated using representative cultivars of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), eggplant (Solanum melongena L.), and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Evaluations of the extent of graft (in)compatibility were made by examining survival percentages, fruit yields, and fruit quality in grafted plants. Tomato/pepper (scion/rootstock) and pepper/tomato grafts were considered severely incompatible, and the tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato grafts were considered moderately incompatible, when compared with the compatible homo-specific graft combinations of tomato/tomato, eggplant/eggplant, and pepper/pepper.Three, or 3 and 6 weeks after grafting, the dry weights of scions and rootstocks, carbohydrate concentrations in stems above and below the graft unions, scion mineral nutrient concentrations, water potentials of scions, and xylem hydraulic conductivities were measured in the grafted plants. The anatomy of the graft unions was also observed. Growth inhibition and high mortality in tomato/pepper and pepper/tomato grafts (i.e., severe graft incompatibility) was due to discontinuities in the vascular bundles at the graft union, which prevented the translocation of assimilates, mineral nutrients, and water between scions and rootstocks. Reductions in fruit yield and/or fruit quality of tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato grafts (i.e., moderate graft incompatibility) may have been due to differences in the requirements for assimilates and mineral nutrients between tomato and eggplant. Plant responses to graft incompatibility varied in solanaceous plants depending on the scion and rootstock combination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato grafts were moderately incompatible compared with compatible homo-specific graft combinations

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Treatment
tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato graftse2
Outcome
moderately incompatiblee2
Comparator
compatible homo-specific graft combinations of tomato/tomato, eggplant/eggplant, and pepper/peppere2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato grafts were considered moderately incompatible, when compared with the compatible homo-specific graft combinations of tomato/tomato, eggplant/eggplant, and pepper/pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–660 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth inhibition and high mortality in tomato/pepper and pepper/tomato grafts were attributed to vascular bundle discontinuities at the graft union

Organ / stage
vascular bundlese3
Treatment
tomato/pepper and pepper/tomato graftse3
Outcome
Growth inhibition and high mortalitye3
Qualifier
discontinuities in the vascular bundles at the graft unione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Growth inhibition and high mortality in tomato/pepper and pepper/tomato grafts (i.e., severe graft incompatibility) was due to discontinuities in the vascular bundles at the graft union, which prevented the translocation of assimilates, mineral nutrients, and water between scions and rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield and/or fruit quality were reduced in tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato grafts

Organ / stage
fruite4
Treatment
tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato graftse4
Outcome
fruit yield and/or fruit qualitye4
Direction
Reductionse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Reductions in fruit yield and/or fruit quality of tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato grafts (i.e., moderate graft incompatibility) may have been due to differences in the requirements for assimilates and mineral nutrients between tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1551 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced yield and quality in moderately incompatible grafts may stem from differing assimilate and mineral requirements of tomato and eggplant

Outcome
Reductions in fruit yield and/or fruit qualitye4
Qualifier
differences in the requirements for assimilates and mineral nutrients between tomato and eggplante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Reductions in fruit yield and/or fruit quality of tomato/eggplant and eggplant/tomato grafts (i.e., moderate graft incompatibility) may have been due to differences in the requirements for assimilates and mineral nutrients between tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1551 · show in text ↑

Solanum melongena · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

grafting · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 8 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.