Paper · 2008 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of nitrogen sources, sulphur and boron levels on productivity, nutrient uptake and quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Kapila Shekhawat; Yashbir Singh Shivay

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi to study the effect of N sources (prilled urea and calcium ammonium nitrate), S levels (0, 25 and 50 kg/ha) and B levels (0, 0.75 and 1.50 kg/ha) on yield attributes, yield and the oil quality of spring sunflower. Application of N, S and B fertilizers increased significantly yield attributes, yield and the oil quality parameters of spring sunflower. Calcium ammonium nitrate proved superior to urea in terms of nutrient concentration and their uptake by sunflower. Application of 25 kg S/ha was more effective in increasing the growth, yield attributes and yields than of 50 kg S/ha. However, the highest seed yield (1.99 t/ha) was recorded with 50 kg S/ha, which was 13% higher than that of the control. Boron application @ 0.75 kg and 1.5 kg/ha was effective and the crop responded well up to the second dose, and the higher (1.5 kg/ha) level gave the highest seed yield (2.01 t/ha), which was 13.5 and 6.3% more than of the control and 0.75 kg B/ha respectively. It also increased the total nutrient concentration and their uptake by sunflower. Application of S and B markedly improved the content of unsaturated fatty acids (linoleic and oleic) and reduced that of the saturated fatty acids (palmitic and stearic). S and B application reduced the saponification but increased the iodine value significantly. The N sources and S and B levels did not show marked changes in the acid value of sunflower oil. Thus, application of 80 kg N/ha through calcium ammonium nitrate along with 25 kg S/ha and 1.50 kg B/ha would be sufficient to sustain the productivity and quality of spring sunflower under north Indian conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of N, S and B fertilizers significantly increased yield attributes, yield and oil quality parameters of spring sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Application of N, S and B fertilizerse1
Outcome
yield attributes, yield and the oil quality parameterse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
New Delhie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of N, S and B fertilizers increased significantly yield attributes, yield and the oil quality parameters of spring sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium ammonium nitrate was superior to urea in nutrient concentration and uptake by sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse2
Treatment
Calcium ammonium nitratee2
Outcome
nutrient concentration and their uptakee2
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
ureae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“Calcium ammonium nitrate proved superior to urea in terms of nutrient concentration and their uptake by sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 kg S/ha was more effective than 50 kg S/ha in increasing growth, yield attributes and yields of sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
25 kg S/hae3
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yieldse3
Direction
more effectivee3
Comparator
50 kg S/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 25 kg S/ha was more effective in increasing the growth, yield attributes and yields than of 50 kg S/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg S/ha gave the highest seed yield (1.99 t/ha), 13% higher than the control.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
50 kg S/hae4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
1.99 t/hae4
Qualifier
13% higher than that of the controle4
Comparator
the controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest seed yield (1.99 t/ha) was recorded with 50 kg S/ha, which was 13% higher than that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1.5 kg B/ha gave the highest seed yield (2.01 t/ha), 13.5% and 6.3% more than the control and 0.75 kg B/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
1.5 kg/hae5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
2.01 t/hae5
Qualifier
13.5 and 6.3% more than of the controle5
Comparator
0.75 kg B/hae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e5

“the higher (1.5 kg/ha) level gave the highest seed yield (2.01 t/ha), which was 13.5 and 6.3% more than of the control and 0.75 kg B/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron application increased total nutrient concentration and uptake by sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse6
Treatment
B levels (0, 0.75 and 1.50 kg/ha)e7
Outcome
total nutrient concentration and their uptakee6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also increased the total nutrient concentration and their uptake by sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1168 · show in text ↑
e7

“B levels (0, 0.75 and 1.50 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S and B application improved the content of unsaturated fatty acids (linoleic and oleic) in sunflower oil.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Application of S and Be1
Outcome
content of unsaturated fatty acids (linoleic and oleic)e1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of S and B markedly improved the content of unsaturated fatty acids (linoleic and oleic) and reduced that of the saturated fatty acids (palmitic and stearic)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S and B application reduced the content of saturated fatty acids (palmitic and stearic) in sunflower oil.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Application of S and Be1
Outcome
saturated fatty acids (palmitic and stearic)e1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of S and B markedly improved the content of unsaturated fatty acids (linoleic and oleic) and reduced that of the saturated fatty acids (palmitic and stearic)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S and B application reduced saponification of sunflower oil.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
S and B applicatione1
Outcome
saponificatione1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“S and B application reduced the saponification but increased the iodine value significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S and B application increased the iodine value of sunflower oil significantly.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
S and B applicatione1
Outcome
iodine valuee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“S and B application reduced the saponification but increased the iodine value significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N sources and S and B levels did not markedly change the acid value of sunflower oil.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
N sources and S and B levelse1
Outcome
acid value of sunflower oile1
Direction
did not show marked changese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2005 and 2006 on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“The N sources and S and B levels did not show marked changes in the acid value of sunflower oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1529 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Recommendation: 80 kg N/ha as calcium ammonium nitrate with 25 kg S/ha and 1.50 kg B/ha is sufficient to sustain productivity and quality of spring sunflower in north Indian conditions.

Taxon
spring sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
80 kg N/ha through calcium ammonium nitrate along with 25 kg S/ha and 1.50 kg B/hae1
Outcome
productivity and quality of spring sunflowere1
Setting
north Indian conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of 80 kg N/ha through calcium ammonium nitrate along with 25 kg S/ha and 1.50 kg B/ha would be sufficient to sustain the productivity and quality of spring sunflower under north Indian conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1744 · show in text ↑

boron atom · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

boron atom · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

calcium ammonium nitrate · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

89 papers: 76 positive, 13 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.