Paper · 2001 · Agricultural science digest

Chemical control of basal stem rot of coconut {Cocos nucifera (L.)}

R. Ganesha Naik

3
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Basal stem rot (BSR) incited by Ganoderma Jucidem (leys) Karsten is wide spread in coconut plantations in Kamataka state often causing a loss of 5.13% annually. An experiment was conducted during 1997–2000 in five farmers' coconut gardens in Arsikere Taluk of Hassan District, Kamataka, for control of the disease, using systemic fungicides viz., Tridemorph (Calaxin) and Hexaconazole (Contaf). The fungicides were given as root feeding, soil drenching and root feeding plus soil drenching at quarterly interval. All the treatments were quite effective in checking the disease. The lowest-disease index was achieved with Tridemorph root feeding (2%)+soil drenching (0.3%) followed by Hexaconazole root feeding (1%) +soil drenching (0.2%) and soil drenching with Tridemorph (0.3%) and Hexaconazole (0.2%), root feeding alone was less effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fungicide treatments were effective in checking basal stem rot of coconut caused by Ganoderma

Taxon
coconutt0
Treatment
systemic fungicides viz., Tridemorph (Calaxin) and Hexaconazole (Contaf)e3
Interactor
Ganoderma Jucideme0pathogen
Outcome
checking the diseasee1
Setting
five farmers' coconut gardens in Arsikere Taluk of Hassan District, Kamatakae2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Basal stem rot (BSR) incited by Ganoderma Jucidem (leys) Karsten”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the treatments were quite effective in checking the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–576 · show in text ↑
e2

“in five farmers' coconut gardens in Arsikere Taluk of Hassan District, Kamataka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–285 · show in text ↑
e3

“using systemic fungicides viz., Tridemorph (Calaxin) and Hexaconazole (Contaf)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical control of basal stem rot of coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tridemorph root feeding plus soil drenching gave the lowest disease index of coconut basal stem rot

Taxon
coconutt0
Treatment
Tridemorph root feeding (2%)+soil drenching (0.3%)e4
Interactor
Ganoderma Jucideme0pathogen
Outcome
disease indexe4
Direction
loweste4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Basal stem rot (BSR) incited by Ganoderma Jucidem (leys) Karsten”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“in five farmers' coconut gardens in Arsikere Taluk of Hassan District, Kamataka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–285 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest-disease index was achieved with Tridemorph root feeding (2%)+soil drenching (0.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical control of basal stem rot of coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root feeding alone was less effective than the other treatments in checking coconut basal stem rot

Taxon
coconutt0
Treatment
root feeding alonee5
Interactor
Ganoderma Jucideme0pathogen
Outcome
checking the diseasee1
Direction
less effectivee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Basal stem rot (BSR) incited by Ganoderma Jucidem (leys) Karsten”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the treatments were quite effective in checking the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–576 · show in text ↑
e5

“root feeding alone was less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical control of basal stem rot of coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑

infection · disease · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
    Aureofungin-sol root feeding with Bordeaux drenching and neem cake achieved the lowest disease index.

    Management of basal stem rot of coconut · 2001 · compared with tridemorph root feeding (2%) + soil drenching (0.1%) at quarterly interval along with soil application of neem cake at 5 kg/palm/year

    Same direction

  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · disease · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Aureofungin-sol root feeding with Bordeaux drenching and neem cake achieved the lowest disease index.

    Management of basal stem rot of coconut · 2001 · compared with tridemorph root feeding (2%) + soil drenching (0.1%) at quarterly interval along with soil application of neem cake at 5 kg/palm/year

    Same direction

  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.