Paper · 2026 · Experimental and Applied Acarology

Delay in Aceria guerreronis infestation may reduce necrosis and fruit drop in coconut trees

Girleide Vieira de França-Beltrão; Vanessa Farias da Silva; Antônio de Almeida Paz Neto; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The coconut mite, Aceria guerreronis, colonizes the fruit perianth, a region covered by floral bracts, which hinders its control. Its attack causes epidermal necrosis, fruit deformation, and premature fruit drop, with yield losses ranging from 10% to 70%. Infestations generally begin in fruit up to three months old. Since the age of the fruit at the time of infestation can influence not only the severity of damage but also fruit abortion, these aspects were investigated through field experiments. Fruit aged 2 to 5 months were artificially infested with A. guerreronis, and every 15 days, necrotic area and number of aborted fruit were quantified until harvest (≈ 8 months). Both damage severity and abortion rate were significantly higher in younger fruit (2-3 months) than in older fruit (4-5 months); however, damage severity had no direct influence on abortion. These results indicate that the extent of necrotic lesions is not a determining factor for fruit abortion. Despite significant damage observed in some infested fruit, many remained attached to the plant and continued to develop. Others, however, aborted without any necrotic lesions. These findings suggest that other factors, such as physiological mechanisms of tolerance or compensation by the host plant, may influence fruit retention. Understanding these dynamics is essential to improve pest management strategies and avoid overestimating potential yield losses associated with mite infestation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mite damage severity was significantly higher in 2–3 month fruit than in 4–5 month fruit.

Taxon
coconut treest0
Organ / stage
younger fruit (2-3 months)e1
Treatment
artificially infested with A. guerreronise0
Interactor
A. guerreronisAceria guerreronise0pest
Outcome
damage severitye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
older fruit (4-5 months)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aceria guerreronis
Aceria guerreronis · InteractorHartford Hammond Keifer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“coconut trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit aged 2 to 5 months were artificially infested with A. guerreronis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–573 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both damage severity and abortion rate were significantly higher in younger fruit (2-3 months) than in older fruit (4-5 months)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mite infested 2–3 month fruit had significantly higher abortion rates than 4–5 month fruit.

Taxon
coconut treest0
Organ / stage
younger fruit (2-3 months)e1
Treatment
artificially infested with A. guerreronise0
Interactor
A. guerreronisAceria guerreronise0pest
Outcome
abortion ratee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
older fruit (4-5 months)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aceria guerreronis
Aceria guerreronis · InteractorHartford Hammond Keifer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“coconut trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit aged 2 to 5 months were artificially infested with A. guerreronis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–573 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both damage severity and abortion rate were significantly higher in younger fruit (2-3 months) than in older fruit (4-5 months)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–807 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage severity had no direct influence on fruit abortion.

Taxon
coconut treest0
Organ / stage
fruite1
Outcome
abortione0
Qualifier
damage severity had no direct influencee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“coconut trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“damage severity had no direct influence on abortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“also fruit abortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–441 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some severely damaged infested fruit remained attached and developed.

Taxon
coconut treest0
Organ / stage
infested fruite0
Outcome
remained attached to the plant and continued to develope0

Verbatim

t0

“coconut trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Despite significant damage observed in some infested fruit, many remained attached to the plant and continued to develop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some fruit aborted without necrotic lesions.

Taxon
coconut treest0
Outcome
aborted without any necrotic lesionse0

Verbatim

t0

“coconut trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Others, however, aborted without any necrotic lesions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1153 · show in text ↑

infection · disease · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Aureofungin-sol root feeding with Bordeaux drenching and neem cake achieved the lowest disease index.

    Management of basal stem rot of coconut · 2001 · compared with tridemorph root feeding (2%) + soil drenching (0.1%) at quarterly interval along with soil application of neem cake at 5 kg/palm/year

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.