Paper · 2007 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Management of Insect Pests of Okra Through Insecticides and Intercropping

S.R. Sinha; Rai Singh; R.K. Sharma

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

All these treatments that had neo-nicotinoids viz., as seed treatment with thiamethoxam (3 or 5 g.a.i./kg seed) or as a foliar spray of acetamiprid @ 20 g.a.i./ha or thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./ha at 30 days of sowing were found effective in managing leafhopper population. Okra intercropped with baby corn also brought some significant reduction in pre-spray population of leafhoppers. Seed treated with thiamethoxam @ 5 g.a.i./kg followed by two foliar sprays alternately with abamectin @ 15 g.a.i./ha and spinosad @ 75 g.a.i./ha at fortnightly interval or the spray schedule of thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./ha followed by fipronil @ 50 g.a.i./ha at fortnightly interval was found to be most effective strategy to manage leafhopper and shoot and fruit borer of okra.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam seed treatment controlled leafhopper populations.

Treatment
seed treatment with thiamethoxam (3 or 5 g.a.i./kg seed)e0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
leafhopper populatione0
Direction
effective in managinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with thiamethoxam (3 or 5 g.a.i./kg seed) or as a foliar spray of acetamiprid @ 20 g.a.i./ha or thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./ha at 30 days of sowing were found effective in managing leafhopper population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid foliar spray controlled leafhopper populations.

Treatment
foliar spray of acetamiprid @ 20 g.a.i./hae0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
leafhopper populatione0
Direction
effective in managinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of acetamiprid @ 20 g.a.i./ha or thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./ha at 30 days of sowing were found effective in managing leafhopper population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam foliar spray controlled leafhopper populations.

Treatment
thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./hae0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
leafhopper populatione0
Direction
effective in managinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./ha at 30 days of sowing were found effective in managing leafhopper population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping okra with baby corn significantly reduced pre-spray leafhoppers.

Treatment
intercropped with baby corne0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
pre-spray population of leafhopperse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra intercropped with baby corn also brought some significant reduction in pre-spray population of leafhoppers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam seed treatment followed by alternating abamectin and spinosad sprays was among the most effective strategies for okra leafhopper and shoot and fruit borer.

Treatment
Seed treated with thiamethoxam @ 5 g.a.i./kg followed by two foliar sprays alternately with abamectin @ 15 g.a.i./ha and spinosad @ 75 g.a.i./hae0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Second interactor
shoot and fruit borere0pest
Outcome
manage leafhopper and shoot and fruit borere0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treated with thiamethoxam @ 5 g.a.i./kg followed by two foliar sprays alternately with abamectin @ 15 g.a.i./ha and spinosad @ 75 g.a.i./ha at fortnightly interval or the spray schedule of thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./ha followed by fipronil @ 50 g.a.i./ha at fortnightly interval was found to be most effective strategy to manage leafhopper and shoot and fruit borer of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential thiamethoxam and fipronil sprays were among the most effective strategies for okra leafhopper and shoot and fruit borer.

Treatment
spray schedule of thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./ha followed by fipronil @ 50 g.a.i./hae0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Second interactor
shoot and fruit borere0pest
Outcome
manage leafhopper and shoot and fruit borere0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spray schedule of thiamethoxam @ 20 g.a.i./ha followed by fipronil @ 50 g.a.i./ha at fortnightly interval was found to be most effective strategy to manage leafhopper and shoot and fruit borer of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–760 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

thiamethoxam · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.